« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Republican Keynesians

By: tkc in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 29 Oct 11 4:21 AM | 112 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06163 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06162 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Alea, obviously truth, honesty and reality are very difficult concepts for this new Republican party to grasp as they continue to "preach" for/to the religious right and bow to the "militaty/industrial" complex. It's so obvious their primary interest lays w/ shrinking government regulation solely to panter to the rich and their greed, retaining their "honey pot." How they continue to manage to retain both these divergent bases (pro corporate/military and religious right) amazes me. I understand the former, but the latter? Just "right to life," and not avarice, prevarication, anti civil/human rights and a whole host of other "sins." I distain the thought that this religous constituency is simply brainwashed or unable to employ simple logic. Sadly Micro comes to mind. Dumb or hypocrites - or both?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Republican Keynesians
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 28 Oct 11 11:41 PM
Msg. 06162 of 54959

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/republicans-cry-uncle-on-spending-when-cuts-hit-home.php?ref=fpb

"With just a under a month until the deficit Super Committee must recommend policies that cut the 10 year deficit by $1.2 trillion, members of the Republican party — the same party that’s been on the war path for deep spending cuts, and that decries President Obama’s “failed stimulus” — are making uncharacteristic arguments against slashing spending. Trim too much, too quickly, they warn, and people will lose their jobs!

Call them Defense Keynesians — GOP members who represent defense interests, veterans, service members, contractors, and others whose livelihoods would be impacted by deep cuts to defense spending. They don’t want the Super Committee to cut much more, if any, from defense, and they certainly don’t want to pull the so-called “trigger” which would cut defense across the board by about $600 billion starting in 2013, if the panel gridlocks."

Huh? Could it be that the Republicans are strict about spending only with respect to the particular areas of government they don't like?

Deficit hawks? Not quite.

Social contract hawks? Oh yes.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next