Jonathan Skeele's Davenport reports consist of innuendo, supported by no analysis provided by management. That is poor and worthless coverage, in my honest opinion. His opinion is molded by the chatter on the IHUB message board which consists of innuendo, which too is supported by no analysis.
He has concerns, projects them but has no consistent track record of being on conference calls. Where does he get answers? Not from management. Again, he bases his opinion not from management but what appears to be the mood on the IHUB board. By not being on past calls, not having his theories supported by specific questions and answers in past conference calls told me long ago that he is not interested in getting any answers for investors. He gets no answers to his questions, because he asks none to support assumptions which make up his report. His reports meet the agenda he sells to those who dare invest with him in his "patent-focused coverage universe" based in the mecca of the "patent-focussed coverage universe" the toilet stall in the office building he works in located in Richmond, VA!
| 