« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: And these people want to be our next Commander in Chief...

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 28 Oct 11 7:16 PM | 57 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 35384 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 35382 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I think he was limiting himself to the wannabes who might have at least an outside chance of getting the nomination. Besides, he left out only 25% of the current list, which still leaves 75% as totally unqualified based on their responses, which was the theme of the article in the first place.




Avatar

OCU


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: And these people want to be our next Commander in Chief...
By: Decomposed
in FFFT
Fri, 28 Oct 11 6:22 PM
Msg. 35382 of 65535

Interesting! Ashwin Madia had no criticism at all in his article for either Ron Paul's or Jon Huntsman's positions on Iraq. He must agree with them. It's a shame he didn't have the integrity to stop his article from being published with a misleading headline.

Senator Obummer, btw, voted for or abstained from all of President Bush's war funding requests until he was actively seeking the Presidency.

Ron Paul voted against the Iraq War Resolution bill and consistently voted against funding for the war in Iraq. He co-sponsored a resolution to repeal the war authorization.

Hm. It sounds like Paul's track record is a lot better than Obummer's, doesn't it? Unfortunately, Obummer, too, like the Republican losers criticized in the article, "wants to be our next Commander in Chief."


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next