Thanks Migo, I know TC doesn't like IHUB drug over hear but I thought providing several links I wrote describing;
why QCOM should consider buying IDCC
why Intel should consider buying IDCC
and why evaluating startegic alternatives could take time
may be acceptable while we are waiting on real news. Many of you probably lived through most of this so feel free to delete this post if the links are not worth while. While I wasn't happy my last post on IHUB was deleted and needed "santized" before it was "acceptable" I have no problem with this post being deleted.
Series of posts describing several reasons why QCOM should consider buying IDCC with feedback provided by Data.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66374079
Sources used for why QCOM should consider buying IDCC
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=66374079
Comparing the merits of QCOM & IDCC from 1994 forward
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66376444
QCOM statement provides for re-rate setting
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=66376444
My final post on IDCC & QCOM. 4G ushers in usage of a new wireless technology base for the foreseeable future.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66445406
Why Intel should consider buying IDCC
Intel and QCOM do appear headed to wireless competition from my perspective JMHO. Links describing Intel’s evolution as a competitor to QCOM. Since the consumer processing market is shifting from desktops to portables, Intel must shift their focus also.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67615247
Non-technical post trying to explain why evaluating strategic alternatives may take time
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67767165
Have a good night,
Tech