« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: I Am the 99%. How About You?

By: DGpeddler in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 17 Oct 11 12:47 AM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 45127 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 45116 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I liked this part. I think it says it all.

"Taking responsibility
First, citizens would be forced to accept personal responsibility for the decisions they have made. Too many times, I've seen signs and heard interviews with protesters clamoring over the loss of their houses.

Certainly, some banks have fouled up the foreclosure process, but that doesn't change the fact that the end result was inevitable.

While I can certainly sympathize with their plight (I bought a condo at the height of the bubble that's fallen significantly in value), no one held a gun to anyone's head and forced them to make purchases they shouldn't have been making in the first place."




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
I Am the 99%. How About You?
By: Zimbler0
in POPE
Sun, 16 Oct 11 9:40 PM
Msg. 45116 of 65535

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/10/10/i-am-the-99-how-about-you.aspx

For the past few days, I've been trying to wrap my head around what it is -- exactly -- that protesters are trying to accomplish with their "Occupy Wall Street" demonstrations.

Even the man responsible for starting the protests, Adbusters Editor-in-Chief Kalle Lasn, wasn't quite sure what the rallying cry would be. "The demand could be some stupid lefty thing like 'overthrow capitalism,'" Lasn said back in September. "We're hoping it's something specific and doable.”

Now in its third week, this nascent movement seems to have found its motto.

"We are the 99%"
In case you’re wondering, if your household takes in less than $1.5 million per year, you, too, are in the bottom 99% of income earners, according to statistics from the Tax Policy Center.

(Article does continue.)


Zim:
The article goes on with a graph. Showing, in the
1920's the top 1% made some 70% of the money.

In the 1960's, the bottom 90% made some 65% of the
money. And we've been going down ever since.

My suspicion is that as America goes more and more
socialist, the 'wealth disparity' gets worse and
worse.

As in, the more 'power and control' that is exercised
by 'socialists' . . . the more that control is abused
and used by the wealthy to enrich themselves while
impoverishing everybody else.

I do not believe it is a coincidence that the rise
of the welfare state inthe 1960's marked the fall
of the American Middle Class.

Zim.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next