« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: So, Apparently the Claims that Fox Won the Right to Lie in Court aren't Truthful

By: clo in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 05 Oct 11 2:25 PM | 65 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 44520 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 44517 by killthecat)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Fox claimed "deliberate distortion" is covered under the First Amendment! That says it all....

From CeaseSpin.com:

Appellate Court Rules Media Can Legally Lie.
By Mike Gaddy. Published Feb. 28, 2003

The court did not dispute the heart of Akre’s claim, that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers. Fox argued from the first, and failed on three separate occasions, in front of three different judges, to have the case tossed out on the grounds there is no hard, fast, and written rule against deliberate distortion of the news. 


The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves. 


In its six-page written decision, the Court of Appeals held that the Federal Communications Commission position against news distortion is only a “policy,” not a promulgated law, rule, or regulation. Fox aired a report after the ruling saying it was “totally vindicated” by the verdict.

http://foxnewsboycott.com/resources/fox-can-lie-lawsuit/




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: So, Apparently the Claims that Fox Won the Right to Lie in Court aren't Truthful
By: killthecat
in POPE
Wed, 05 Oct 11 6:32 AM
Msg. 44517 of 65535

Beldin:

You and the dopey author have the wrong court case.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next