« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What About Texas 

By: DGpeddler in POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Mon, 03 Oct 11 5:13 PM | 80 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 44367 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 44365 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo, your state would fit in the Panhandle of Texas. Texas is a big state. 

"The Texas Transportation Department has lately warned of a budget crunch. Yet the highway-building agency raked in more federal funds than all but three other state agencies around the nation in the first three quarters of the 2006 fiscal year: $2.9 billion"

And much of that went toward building an expressway from Mexico so that your friends can import more cheap goods and more drugs. 


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: What About Texas
By: clo
in POPE
Mon, 03 Oct 11 5:04 PM
Msg. 44365 of 65535

This is dated but gives us an idea just how much federal aid Texas enjoys...


Texas near the top for raking in federal dollars

BENNETT ROTH, Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

Published 05:30 a.m., Monday, October 8, 2007

WASHINGTON —

Texas has long viewed itself as a conservative bastion, but the Lone Star State ranked third in the nation between 2000 and last year in receipt of federal dollars, raking in aid and contracts worth more than $1.2 trillion. 

An analysis by a private watchdog group found that state agencies and a number of congressional districts were major beneficiaries of the federal largesse. For example:

• Rep. Ron Paul has long crusaded against a big central government. But the maverick GOP lawmaker and presidential contender also has represented a congressional district that is consistently among the top in Texas in its reliance on dollars from Washington. In the first nine months of the federal government's 2006 fiscal year alone, it received more than $4 billion in federal aid.

• The Texas Transportation Department has lately warned of a budget crunch. Yet the highway-building agency raked in more federal funds than all but three other state agencies around the nation in the first three quarters of the 2006 fiscal year: $2.9 billion
These and other findings are included in a state-by-state breakdown of federal spending by the group OMB Watch.

The analysis provides an insight into where federal dollars are flowing and underscores what Southern Methodist University political science professor Cal Jillson calls the "pork-barrel libertarianism" philosophy of many Texans.

"Texans like to think of themselves as the modern-day Marlboro Man," he said, "small government, low taxes and deregulation and 'keep your hands out of our pockets and I will take care of myself.' But they reach out to Washington every time there seems to be federal money available."

Proponents of federal aid argue that Texas — the second most populous state in the nation, behind California — deserves to get every dollar back from Washington that it pays in federal taxes.

Adam Hughes, the director of fiscal policy for OMB watch, said that the districts where federal dollars end up is more a reflection of the demographics of an area than the political ideology of its representatives.

So much of the money, he said, comes from such mandated programs as Social Security and Medicare.

He said the programs, over which lawmakers have little short-term control, help explain why Paul's district ranks among the top in Texas in receiving federal funds — more than $31 billion from 2000 through most of the 2006 fiscal year.

It is difficult to make comparisons among Texas' congressional districts before the 2006 fiscal year because a Republican redistricting plan approved by the Texas Legislature shifted a number of boundaries, including those in the Gulf Coast district represented by Paul.

But Paul's district ranked in the top five in the state in federal aid before the redistricting.

His current district, which includes Galveston and reaches into Brazoria County, draws a substantial amount of federal flood insurance payments.

A longtime libertarian, Paul has held that federal spending should be limited to what is prescribed in the Constitution. He routinely votes against appropriations bills.

Paul's spokeswoman, Rachel Mills, said the congressman is aware that his district ranks high as a recipient of federal dollars.

She said Paul will continue to support federal grants to the district,"as long as taxes are taken by force from the people of Texas."

She added, "While Congressman Paul strongly believes that federal spending is out of control, the government has made promises to people in the form of Medicare and Social Security that many rely on, and it would be wrong to break those promises."

Lawmakers have greater leverage over the doling out of private contracts by the federal government. They can insert earmarks into spending bills that direct money to companies or groups operating in their district.
http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Texas-near-the-top-for-raking-in-federal-dollars-1842411.php


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next