Why is the Financial Times article dated August 23, 2011?
... also the Financial Times has a responsibility to not just reference dealReporter but also let the reader know that they are an associated company. The Pearson Company/Financial Times Group has no problem consolidating the revenue they earn from dealReporter but do not want to make it obvious (color scheme, FT logo) on dealReporter's website that they are related to this nefarious operation. Why FT wouldn't offer the same service under their logo but instead decided to farm out this responsibility to this organization really makes this type of operation stink even more. IE. the journalistic standards at FT cannot be blatantly associated with for-profit instant rumor mongering. Bullshit, slimy bullshit, IMO.