« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: DealReporter article 

By: Rakitn0 in IDCC | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 28 Sep 11 9:18 PM | 56 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 42977 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 42975 by postyle)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Why is the Financial Times article dated August 23, 2011?

... also the Financial Times has a responsibility to not just reference dealReporter but also let the reader know that they are an associated company. The Pearson Company/Financial Times Group has no problem consolidating the revenue they earn from dealReporter but do not want to make it obvious (color scheme, FT logo) on dealReporter's website that they are related to this nefarious operation. Why FT wouldn't offer the same service under their logo but instead decided to farm out this responsibility to this organization really makes this type of operation stink even more. IE. the journalistic standards at FT cannot be blatantly associated with for-profit instant rumor mongering. Bullshit, slimy bullshit, IMO.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
DealReporter article
By: postyle
in IDCC
Wed, 28 Sep 11 9:00 PM
Msg. 42975 of 48237

http://t.co/Egnyo9pf


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next