Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Americans Favor Jobs Plan Proposals, Including Taxing Rich

By: Decomposed in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 21 Sep 11 11:26 PM | 48 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought 		Msg. 33931 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 33928 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo,

re: "Voting for Ron Paul takes away a vote FOR one of the two TOP Electable possibilities."

Stalin, Hitler, and Ron Paul (who isn't in the top two.)

Which one are you going to vote for, clo? 

By the time of the 2008 election, polls had already decided that Virginia would go for Obama.

What, then, would the point have been in voting for someone I despised, McCain? It wouldn't have changed the result. I wrote in the candidate who I actually supported.

In doing so, I improved the results for my candidate and made him a stronger candidate four years later.

So my vote wasn't passive at all.


I'm still waiting for your answer to my "pitter-patter" question. Stalin or Hitler, clo?




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Americans Favor Jobs Plan Proposals, Including Taxing Rich
By: clo in FFFT
Wed, 21 Sep 11 11:15 PM 		Msg. 33928 of 65535

Voting for Ron Paul is *NOT* a vote for "the top two."

Sure it is.
Voting for Ron Paul takes away a vote FOR one of the two TOP Electable possibilities.
In a close election "your" vote & others like you could make the difference.

That's the reason I label it "your" passive vote.

« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next