« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: According to Faux News' Brit Hume, inequality which favors the rich shouldn't be anyone else's concern... 

By: killthecat in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 21 Sep 11 6:32 PM | 64 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 33871 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 33870 by killthecat)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Especially worrisome to Grantham is the gulf between wage earners in the U.S. The top 10% of U.S. workers currently receive about half of the nation's total income, with half of that going to the top 1%. The last time this country saw a wage gap so extreme was just before the 1929 stock-market crash and the Great Depression. By comparison, in the late 1970s the top 1% garnered about 9% of all earnings.

"You can't run the economy on BMWs alone," Grantham said. "If the average person is in a pickle, how do you have a healthy economy?"

For starters, he said, you tax the richest more than they're paying now. Said Grantham: "We have actually made the tax structure friendlier to the top 10%."

Grantham contends that income inequality at these levels takes a real toll on ordinary workers and society as a whole. To bridge this gap and give average workers a bigger slice of the pie, Grantham advocates investing in education, training, and to "change the tax structure to make it equitable."

Value Stocks, Rich Market

Grantham also doesn't approve of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke taking steps that he said essentially have put savers in a box. Keeping interest rates low, and stating that rates will remain in the cellar for at least a couple of years, forces people to take more risk with their money if they want yield and capital appreciation.

"You're transferring money away from retirees" who must either delve into stocks, gold or some other higher-stakes investment, or languish in savings accounts and low-yielding bonds, Grantham said. "They could use that money. They would spend every penny."

Instead, Grantham said the Fed's policy puts money "in the hands of people who aren't spending it — people who only buy BMWs and don't support Wal-Mart." This creates a vicious cycle in which, Grantham said, individual savers are penalized and restrain spending, while the beneficiaries are "bankers and corporations that can build factories all over the place — except they won't because consumption is too weak."

Accordingly, Grantham sees this path coming to no good end over the short-term. He said he expects another leg down for the U.S. stock market, one where shares could stay low-priced for years while U.S. economic growth plods along at maybe 2% annually instead of the relatively more robust historical average of around 3.4%.



- - - - -
View Replies (3) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: According to Faux News' Brit Hume, inequality which favors the rich shouldn't be anyone else's concern...
By: killthecat
in FFFT
Wed, 21 Sep 11 5:44 PM
Msg. 33870 of 65535

It's official. The first decade of the 21st century will go down in the history books as a step back for the American middle class.

Last week, the government made gloomy headlines when it released the latest census report showing the poverty rate rose to a 17-year high. A whopping 46.2 million people (or 15.1% of the U.S. population) live in poverty and 49.9 million live without health insurance.

But the data also gave the first glimpse of what happened to middle-class incomes in the first decade of the millennium. While the earnings of middle-income Americans have barely budged since the mid 1970s, the new data showed that from 2000 to 2010, they actually regressed.

For American households in the middle of the pay scale, income fell to $49,445 last year, when adjusted for inflation, a level not seen since 1996. And over the 10-year period, their income is down 7%.

"Economists talk about the lost decade in Japan. Well, with these 2010 data, we can confirm the lost decade for the American middle class," said Jared Bernstein, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Sure, it's fair to say Americans at all levels of income, from rich to poor, were hit hard in the decade that started with the dot-com boom and bust, and ended with the Great Recession.

Rising costs for middle class

But according to the census data, those losses disproportionately hit the lowest 60% of Americans, while the richest 40% actually gained wealth, relative to the entire U.S. economy.

Much of that trend can be explained by massive losses in the housing sector, the period of high unemployment that ensued, and rising prices that flew in the face of the American family's heightened financial struggles.

Unlike the richest Americans, middle class families have most of their wealth tied up in the equity of their homes, which took a beating in the recession. And high unemployment has left many people with little or no other income at all.

At the same time that Americans had less cash to spend, they were also being hit with rising prices for some crucial items. Even accounting for inflation, it still costs more to buy a home, fill your gas tank, go to the doctor and put food on the table than it did only 10 years ago.

And not only is it more expensive to live a middle-class life, it costs more to get there too. The price of a college education -- still considered the ticket to higher wages and a better lifestyle -- has surged over the last decade, even in spite of the recession.

Facing these burdens, the American Dream is undergoing stark changes, with fewer people choosing to buy homes and more young people postponing their own independent lives. The census data showed about 14.2% of all young people ages 25 to 34 are still living in their parents' homes this year, compared to about 11.8% before the recession began in 2007.

And that poses a challenge for the economy going forward. After all, what will the middle class and the American Dream look like another decade from now, if the younger generations still can't get their feet off the ground?

View this article on CNNMoney

http://finance.yahoo.com/


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next