« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: rak 

By: hydro_gen in IDCC | Recommend this post (5)
Wed, 21 Sep 11 1:05 AM | 74 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 42774 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 42773 by Rakitn0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Mix a stiff drink, fire up a fat one and R-E-L-A-X

This will make one hell of a movie one day and we will have time to write the script after it is OVER......

PEACE

Hydro_gen




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: rak
By: Rakitn0
in IDCC
Wed, 21 Sep 11 1:00 AM
Msg. 42773 of 48237

Teecee the timing is shit. And so is the report. My mood is shit too so that is the 1-2-3/trifecta. This report could have come out 3 years ago, but the kid who wrote it probably was in junior high then. He could have come to the same conclusions in April, but didn't. Instead in an environment where options are rolling and people have 3 digit prices in their head it comes out. And who pimps it, but none other than one of the clowns this guy follows on Twitter, Markflowchatter. This kid doesn't quantifiably value the "disruptive" portion of the patents. What they can and will be used for when he sets his comparative to the Nortel auction instead throws out a simple $10-$20 premium. That's where the rocket fuel is! Insetad he does a simple quant analysis, where his answer is used as a headline to justify why lines just gotta cross other lines to fill gaps and shit. IDCC currently trading at $59+, seriously? Because what some fucking chartist ... errr ... alchemist went Double, Double Toil and Trouble and says we gotta get there because it's written in the stars. Fuck that. The timing was bullshit. The move in the afternoon was bullshit ... Anyways, i'm going to go Jerry Tarkanian and bite down on a towel now. I'll chill ... Calgon just take me a-fucking-away!


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next