Hi Janicen,
Old name but different poster?
Maybe MS has changed its spots and has decided to honour other companies' intellectual property rather than to bury them in countersuits! Personally I would not expect to rely on the effectiveness of patents as a shield between companies of very different sizes.
But I think you misconstrue my post if you see me thinking the loss of Dell revenue - which is a hypothesis and not one I am certain about - represents something other than a short-run cashflow issue for Wave, or that the fork in the road is necessarily a bad thing.
The fork represents a point of decision: one path leads towards the sunlit uplands of TC adoption, from which I expect Wave to benefit hugely. The other, the path of excess optimism and poor cost management resulting in dilution and more misery. I don't claim to know which pathway Wave is likely to tread. I am happy that we have reached the point at which all the ifs become a when, and that this when is now.
Re the client side - SKS has said in the past it is his expectation that the client side would end up preponderantly in the hands of a company like MS. I am presuming that remains true, although you may be right that they have forged a position from which it is hard to remove them, and maybe the work of Thibadeaux and others means that is not MS' intention.
Bear in mind that whatever Wave has been offering on the client side up to now has not been sufficient to get users to turn their machines on in very large numbers. I sure hope MS is bringing some client-side excitement to this party.