« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Concealed Guns in NYC Backed by 243 in U.S. House

By: zzstar in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 12 Sep 11 9:56 PM | 55 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 33374 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 33345 by Riana)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

You'd think we live in the old wild west with your commentary.

But we don't. And we don't need concealed guns in the streets of NYC.

Don't come to NY if you feel you can't shoot at people.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Concealed Guns in NYC Backed by 243 in U.S. House
By: Riana
in FFFT
Mon, 12 Sep 11 7:43 PM
Msg. 33345 of 65535

The only part of the article I find disturbing is that the permit was issued despite the clerical error - rather than a letter saying he needed something additional, the permit should have been invalidated.

As for zzstar's comment, in AK, AZ, and VT, no permit is required for concealed carry at all. Contrary to what you may think, there's no blood running in the streets as a result of that. And the law doesn't only apply to in-state residents - I carry my handgun in VT all the time, with nary a problem.

I loathe travelling through NY, especially the more populated areas, simply because in order to be a law-abiding citizen, I must also be defenseless (handgun must be unloaded/disassembled/locked up).

I believe the vast majority of law-abiding folks who wish to purchase and carry a concealed handgun for self-defense are responsible gun owners. Most of them will have some form of training, even if it's not required by Big Brother.

It's those who aren't law-abiding that are the problem, and adding more laws (which they are, by definition, ignoring) isn't going to fix that.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next