Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: USA Gone in 5 years

By: orda in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 26 Aug 11 11:56 PM | 26 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 05689 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 05684 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Who puts a chip on the motherboard (TPM) that doesn't get used for years and why? I think the NSA said to industry, "Look, we want things to proceed like this and we'll get the government buy-in." So the TCG is waiting for the government orders before they really launch things.

I think they got involved with Wave's EMBASSY chip back in 2000. They set it up so that a lot of the different parts got farmed out to the big players and Wave got a certain portion of the system. They've been hanging on ever since.

In the meantime, SKS has tried to drum up money/business through other ventures until the big government turn-on with things like iShopHere, SignOnline, WavXpress, etc. We've seen how those things play out. No way Wave is around if the NSA isn't driving this bus.

I think some "investors" are privy to all this and that's why they're so vehement in their defenses. And that's why that big Wave investor with 6 million shares is still around. I mean who buys 6 million shares in Wave and sits on them for a decade quietly without knowing something. The guy is from Bethesda and is either tied to the NSA or has contacts there.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: USA Gone in 5 years
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Fri, 26 Aug 11 11:12 PM 		Msg. 05684 of 54959

Hi 4321,

I just don't know how many cycles we must go through with the same leader before one questions whether perhaps he is the problem.

The strategy looks great. But it isn't so great that it leads to wide-scale adoption. Who is responsible for that? The CEO is responsible, and unfortunately, he has form.

If someone can give me a reason that withstands questioning why this is not the case, I'm all ears.

Answers that won't do: the sales team is useless; Wave's doing well compared to other companies in the field; it's the fault of XXXXXXX; systems administrators are dumb; etc. I'm sick of badly thought through arguments that get repeated over and over!

If the product is saleable, why isn't it selling? If the product isn't saleable, why hire a sales force? We're stuck with a perfectly circular chain of logic which goes absolutely nowhere. The other explanation lies with insanity.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next