« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Is Texas required to balance the budget?

By: ribit in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 18 Aug 11 11:28 PM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 41417 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 41337 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

zim
...most states have to have a balanced budget.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Is Texas required to balance the budget?
By: Zimbler0
in POPE
Thu, 18 Aug 11 6:54 AM
Msg. 41337 of 65535

I googled the subject . . . and I see several
articles about a balanced budget amendment for
Texas . . I also found one that says Texas MUST
have a balanced budget.

http://www.philking.com/balancedbudget

Texas Law Requires a Balanced Budget

July 29, 2011

Aledo Community News

State Representative Phil King

Why does a balanced budget approach work? It's simple really. The importance of a balanced budget amendment is that it forces the legislature, by force of law, to focus all budget discussions on reconciling spending and revenue. We are free to reconcile by a number of means: raise taxes, cut spending, or a combination of the two. But, at the end of the day, every budget debate comes back to reconciling spending and revenue. As a legislature, we can never ignore it. Even the most liberal members of the legislature are forced to work toward that reconciliation. Otherwise, the Comptroller of Public Accounts will never certify the budget and we start all over again.

Texas runs on a biennial (two year) budget. At the beginning of every biennium the Comptroller submits a biennial revenue estimate to the legislature. This estimate tells the legislature the amount of revenue from taxes and other sources that will likely be available to spend. The legislature then makes the decision on how they want to meet that estimate. If, in years like this one, there is a projected shortfall in revenue, the prudent way for the legislature to reconcile the shortfall is to cut its expenses. For instance, this legislative session the legislature cut spending by 8.1% from the previous biennium. The Comptroller then looks at the adjustments in spending and revenue the legislature makes, and determines whether that amount of revenue is sufficient to cover the state's obligations for the biennium. If it is, then the budget is certified and put into place.

The difference in Washington is that reconciling revenue and spending is never the focus. Instead, the debate is about spending limits. Reconciliation can be easily ignored.

(Article does continue.)

Zim: So, where is the Truth?


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next