Data---a question
By: h48
in
IDCC
Mon, 01 Aug 11 5:09 PM
|
Msg. 41898 of
48237
|
|
A question for you and all the Qcommies (Count, Net, Richbloem etc) although yes, I know you won't speak for the others..
Why are you always minimizing the potentiaql of IDCC? When it was in the 20's, somehow 35 was a magical number. Then it hit the mid 30's and when the 50's was floated as a potential, you were telling everyone to keep expectations in check. Then it hit 50's. When NukeJohn floated 80, you really questioned that one as in people are making "WAG's, floating numbers out there, keep expectations in check, you know the industry" yada yada. Then it hit 80 last week or so. Now people are floating higher numbers and you're back at it, saving everyone from themselves....even though you're in "HR" as you put it...
Whats so threatening to you and the Qcommies should IDCC hit its true potential???
By the way, had I listened to the likes of you guys/so called experts, I woulda been outa IDCC at at around 35. Thank goodness for Teecee and the people on this board!
just sayin....
|
|
| 
