« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ex-Union Member Fights $200,000 Union Fine For Working Non-Union

By: DGpeddler in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 31 Jul 11 10:35 PM | 9 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 40187 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 40185 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Well, gee, 200k will not even cover the union president's wages for a year.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Ex-Union Member Fights $200,000 Union Fine For Working Non-Union
By: Beldin
in POPE
Sun, 31 Jul 11 10:28 PM
Msg. 40185 of 65535

Ex-Union Member Fights $200,000 Union Fine For Working Non-Union
Posted by LaborUnionReport
RedState
Sunday, July 31st at 9:00AM EDT

http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/07/31/ex-union-member-fights-200000-union-fine-for-working-non-union/

Unions have rules. Union members who break those rules can be placed on trial by their union and, if found guilty, can be expelled or suspended from the union. They can also be fined, as Nathaniel Musser has learned the expensive way.

Musser, a former member of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, according to his lawyer, could not find work through his union. So, as union members sometimes do, Musser found work on his own – at a non-union company.

As working non-union is against many trade unions’ rules, the Carpenters’ union filed internal union charges against Musser and imposed a $300,900.00 fine against Musser.

Although Musser appealed and the fine was later reduced to $200,850.00, Musser is also fighting the reduced fine as well.

According to ChicagoUnionNews.com, Musser is alleging in his court documents that the union maintained a policy that precluded members from resigning from the union.

“If he would have known about a way to resign, he would have resigned before he worked for a non-union employer,” [Musser's lawyer Stanley] Niew said.

Joe Heilgeist, identified in court papers as a business representative and organizer of Local 250, declined to comment and the attorney representing the union did not return phone calls.

Frank Libby, president of the Regional Council, said he was unfamiliar with this particular case but said the situation was common.

“It makes sense,” Libby said. “He went to work with a non-union contractor while he held membership. You can’t do that. . . . He made a conscious decision apparently to say the hell with the union.”
[Emphasis added.]

[Hey, Libby ... did ya ever stop and think that maybe the union said "to hell with Musser" when it didn't find him any work to do so he could support his family? Besides, a $200,000 fine ... what kind of highway robbers are you union thugs, anyway ... hedge fund managers?! Rolling Eyes B.]

Note: If you are an out-of-work construction trade union member, before you start working non-union, check your union constitution and local union bylaws. As a union member (in most trade unions), you can be placed on trial for working non-union.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next