« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The poor are not poor because the rich are rich

By: DGpeddler in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 31 Jul 11 10:18 PM | 9 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 40183 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 40180 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

This reminded me of something. When I lived in Gallup, Navajo children were taken from their parents at the age of six so that they could be sent to school and get an education. They were allowed to live at home in the summer. Upon graduation from high school any Navajo who could be accepted into ANY college in the nation, received all the money necessary to get any degree he wanted. Many were able to get good paying jobs. Almost all of those who did, quit within the first ten years and moved back to the reservation. Why? No pressure. On the reservation a Navajo man had no bills to pay. He could have more than one wife. His only worry was keeping his sheep alive so he could sell them for spending money. He could have one wife to tend the sheep and one wife to tend the children. He was head of his house. If he went to town, the wives and kids rode in the back of the pickup. If he bought lunch, his wives and kids watched him eat it.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The poor are not poor because the rich are rich
By: Beldin
in POPE
Sun, 31 Jul 11 9:47 PM
Msg. 40180 of 65535

The poor are not poor because the rich are rich
By Star Parker
The Washington Examiner
07/30/11 8:05 PM

http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/07/poor-are-not-poor-because-rich-are-rich

A just-released study from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press reporting a record high wealth gap between whites and blacks should have been labeled "handle with care."
Because care is needed to examine the complex reality behind the fact that "median wealth of white households is 20 times that of black households. ..."

And without care, this information will be abused and misused by those in the race business as another excuse to claim racism and demand exactly what blacks, or any of us, do not need -- more government.

And, indeed, the Rev. Al Sharpton has already announced plans for protest in Washington, along with the statement: "For those who think we live in some sort of post-racial society, I have news for you: we're anything but."

For one thing, "median wealth" should not be confused with "average wealth." A median average is simply the number right in the middle -- there are an equal number of households with higher and an equal number with lower wealth.

"Average wealth" accounts for the actual wealth of those households and reflects the fact, not reflected in the median number, that there are a good number of well-to-do black households.

So whereas median white household wealth is 20 times higher than median black household wealth, average white household wealth is three times higher than average black household wealth.

The racially tinged headline obscures the deeper reality of what is driving the growing wealth gap. That is that over the period of the study, 2005 to 2009, the gap between those with more wealth and those with less has increased for the whole country.

In fact, over this period, the gap between the most wealthy and least wealthy blacks became more pronounced than the gap between the most wealthy and least wealthy whites.

In 2005, the top 10 percent of wealthy black families represented 56 percent of overall black wealth. By 2009, this top 10 percent represented 67 percent of overall black wealth.

You have to wonder what kind of racial claims Sharpton will make about this.

All this is not to minimize a genuine problem. Far more important than where black wealth stands relative to white wealth is the fact that median, or average, black wealth is far less than it should be.

That 35 percent of all black households have zero or negative wealth (net indebtedness) is dismally sad. What to do?

If there are any public policy implications, it is not to expand government, but to remove it as an obstacle to black wealth creation.

At the most basic level, black children need to get better education and this means giving black parents choice to send their children wherever they want to school.

A better educated black population will mean a higher income earning black population. But income alone is a limited tool for creating wealth. Wealth is created through savings, investment and entrepreneurship. And blacks lag far behind in each category.

The Pew study shows that the major destruction of wealth from 2005 to 2009 resulted from the collapse of housing prices. Blacks suffered disproportionately because black net worth has been almost entirely in their homes.

The idea of allowing investment in a personal retirement account rather than paying the Social Security payroll tax would be a boon to building black wealth.

But when President George W. Bush suggested the personal retirement account idea, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Chairman Julian Bond said this was asking blacks "to play the lottery with their future."

A life of government guarantees and controls is not a formula for building wealth. Freedom and capital markets are. Blacks need to decide which they want.

And entrepreneurship must become part of black culture. Blacks need to get that poor people are not poor because rich people are rich.

The formula for more black wealth: less government, more ownership and initiative.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next