« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Hysteria at the DNC 

By: Beldin in POPE | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 28 Jul 11 9:22 PM | 12 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 40023 of 65535
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hysteria at the DNC
by Jerry Shenk
The American Thinker
July 28, 2011


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/07/_hysteria_at_the_dnc.html

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a House member from Florida and Chairperson of the Democratic National Committee, has publicly accused House Republicans of seeking to impose a "dictatorship" in America.

Apparently Wasserman Schultz has discovered a heretofore unknown loophole in America's constitutional structure that would allow a majority in one-half of one-third of our government to conduct a coup without the involvement of the American military.

Wasserman Schultz:

"Aren't we at the point where the closer we get to chaos, the more concern that there should be about coming to the table and compromising with Democrats?"..."This is not leadership. This is almost like dictatorship. I know they want to force the outcome that...their extremists would like to impose. But they are getting ready to spark panic and chaos, and they seem to be OK with that. And it's just really disappointing, and potentially devastating."

[BWHA HA HA HA!!! Debbie Wasserman Schultz has mad-cow disease. Oh, right ... "the closer we get to chaos," which is an event created and defined by the Democrats, themselves ... then everyone else should simply "compromise" by giving into the hysterical group-emote of the Democrats, eh, Bossie ... er, I mean, Debbie? ROTFLMAO at your stupidity! Wow, the very idea of the federal government trying to live within its means puts Democrats into an uncontrolled tizzy - 'cuz it would start to curb the Democrats' ability to buy votes with other people's money. Rolling Eyes B.]

Democrats have been calling for greater cooperation between the parties since they lost the House majority, a courtesy they never extended to Republicans when Democrats held a majority of seats in both Houses of Congress. Compromise was a word unheard on Capitol Hill during the 111th Congress.

More Wasserman Schultz:

"We've been sitting at the compromise table for a long time. We're just waiting for that cold chair to be warmed up by the Republican leadership. They still have time to do the right thing and be responsible. They just seem to be moving further and further away from it."

[BWHA HA HA HA!!! Oh really ... so that's why Obama arrogantly dismissed any Republican input with "I won," in the early days of his administration, eh? And, ever since then, you've been "sitting at the 'compromise' table" with nothing but empty hands and empty thoughts - no budgets and no plans to even attempt to slow down the drunken spending of your Big Government ideology. Puhleeeeease, lay off the sauce, already, you willfully ignorant wench. The American people have a far different idea of responsible behavior than you do, Debbie ... and it doesn't involve caving in to more of the Democrat Big Government insanity ... which is why you Democrats got your collective asses kicked in the 2010 election. B.]

Ms. Wasserman Schultz...(that's a mouthful, isn't it?) Restart. Debbie, the Republicans have advanced three written plans. Your party and your president have offered none. On what would you have Republicans compromise? And will you and your party interrupt the demonization of Republicans long enough to do a bit of compromising yourselves?




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence




» You can also:
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next