« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Some have a different take. 

By: zzfan in IDCC | Recommend this post (12)
Mon, 25 Jul 11 3:45 PM | 139 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 41699 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 41697 by bim24)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Loop is extremely pleased for the following reasons:

1. My research regarding the value of Nortel was exceeded by a half a billion dollars. I was hoping for 4 billion and got 4.5 billion. I reached these figures based on the testimony of personnel of major manufacturers regarding royalty 3g rates and PR's from Lte patent holders regarding their declared Lte rates (4g). It seemed clear to me that the big OEM's were setting rates at a much higher level in their cross-licensing deals while conspiring to squeeze out and low ball the NPE's for their contributions to the various standards bodies. Thus, they have been able to rock along preventing other large patent poor fledgling OEM's from competing. Now that 4g has allowed the computer/internet manufacturers, movie shops, television operators and others to reach wireless users on a competitive scale, the old guard OEM's were trying to block the entry. The way to combat these established is to acquire a patent portfolio sufficient to offset infringement claims and negotiate cross-licenses on a level playing field. My thesis panned out and the auction result clearly showed that the sector Frandlied themselves to the benefit of inventors in the wireless sector. New boys in town armed with an IPR portfolio such as IDCC can compete worry free. Therefore, the once perceived value of the IDCC portfolio received an immediate evaluation method created by the biggest players in the sector.

2. I was concerned that WM was underestimating the value of its Lte and I believe the Nortel auction served as a wakeup call for him and the board as evidenced by their actions in exploring strategic alternatives within a few weeks of the OK by the Canada bankruptcy judge.

3. I believe the Street will reach a new market cap evaluation beginning with a firesale breakup value which it is doing now and the value will continue to soar as the real breakup value is defined by the interest and actions of the OEM's competing in the wireless sector to provide services to the carriers and operators as they provide services limited only by imagination s of end users around the globe.

4. I believe previous pitfalls in monetizing have been filled in or at least bridged for IDCC to be very valuable as a buyout target or as an operating entity.

Why in the world would I not be the happiest I have ever been as a shareholder of IDCC?

MO
loop


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Some have a different take.
By: bim24
in IDCC
Mon, 25 Jul 11 5:34 AM
Msg. 41697 of 48237

isn't he the same dude that also said that if the even if the CAFC reversed and remanded that there will be other ways to delay and potentially win again against interdig?

one only needs to look at what happened to Batts after getting the hammer from CAFC. She promptly awarded the full amount to IDCC.

isn't he also the same dude that keeps saying if idcc listened to guys like him and licensed for a lower rate, they would go far.... but then he complains in other posts about management giving away the farm on the dollar.

to each his own. it's up to you gents and ladies who you choose to listen to.

it gets even better for me when Dmiller chimes in "I agree, best post of the year, yada, yada..."

after same dude talks each time. He is truly miller's puppet master. I actually find it a little humorous b/c it's almost like clockwork.

on the other hand, i haven't ever seen Loop this euphoric and upbeat about idcc's prospects ever, even when the price was 47 right after the Nortel auction.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next