« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ace Explains Obama's Academic Record Vacuum 

By: ribit in POPE | Recommend this post (4)
Sun, 24 Jul 11 3:31 PM | 8 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 39758 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 39753 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

zimbler
I never thought he was dumb -- just not a genius. 116's a perfectly respectable score, but no one goes bragging on it and claims to be a genius at 116.

...but don't he get extra points for being clean, having a nice crease in his pants and sending a shiver up Chris Matthews leg?????




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Ace Explains Obama's Academic Record Vacuum
By: Zimbler0
in POPE
Sun, 24 Jul 11 3:16 AM
Msg. 39753 of 65535

http://wizbangblog.com/content/2011/04/26/ace-explains-obamas-academic-record-vacuum.php


Obama's IQ Is 116. Hah! This guy guestimates that based on tangible proxy evidence, which is right in the middle of where I figured it would be.

Now, this guy is not just completely making things up. He knows, because there are records of it, that Obama was not a National Merit Scholar, or National Merit Finalist, or the lowest subcategory, "Outstanding Participant." (This seems to be an honor conferred by the College Board (the SAT people) primarily if not exclusively based on SAT scores.)

Since Obama did not make the list for any of those automatically-conferred SAT-based recognitions, we know his SATs must be below those thresholds, setting a hard upper cap on his possible SAT scores.

We can then figure his highest, likeliest IQ score, because the SAT is just a modified version of the old Army IQ test. Current IQ tests and the SATs are both derived straight from the old Army IQ test, testing pretty much the same things and in pretty much the same ways. Different scoring system, but same ultimate term of comparison -- how you rank compared to the general population, expressed as percentile.

Not dumb, but I never thought he was dumb -- just not a genius. 116's a perfectly respectable score, but no one goes bragging on it and claims to be a genius at 116.

(CrossPosted By: Zim.)


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next