« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Tax cuts for the rich 

By: lkorrow in RANT II | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 07 Jul 11 8:23 PM | 37 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II
Msg. 18874 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 18868 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Actually, it doesn't save $25B, it adds to tax revenues. Excellent!




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Tax cuts for the rich
By: CTJ
in RANT II
Thu, 07 Jul 11 6:05 AM
Msg. 18868 of 20747

Ending Tax Break for Union Dues Could Save $25 Billion
12:27 PM, JUL 6, 2011 • BY KATE HAVARD

The weekly standard
     
While President Obama and other Democrats frequently talk about the need for "shared sacrifice" and a "balanced" approach to deficit reduction, their proposal to raise taxes $418 billion is a grab bag of liberal favorites: ending tax breaks for oil companies and corporate jet companies, as well as reducing deductions for couples earning more than $250,000 per year.

While ending the corporate jet tax break will save only $3 billion over the next 10 years, ending a tax break for one big Democratic constituency--unions--could save a lot more money over that same time.

A conservative estimate for union dues paid each year is $8 billion, according to the National Right to Work’s Stan Greer. If over ten years $80 billion in union dues were taxed, the federal government could generate roughly $25 billion in tax revenue.

If the president wants a truly balanced approach to ending tax breaks, why isn't he asking his union friends -- which spent over $400 million on his presidential race and Democratic campaigns in 2008 -- to pay their fair share?

Kate Havard, a student at St. John's College, is an intern at THE WEEKLY STANDARD.


« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next