« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH!!!

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 07 Jul 11 9:51 AM | 31 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 30491 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 30488 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

That is a bunch of crap!!!

Based on the figures in that article, if taxing $80 billion in union dues would return $25 billion in tax revenue, that would mean that the average tax rate paid by those union workers would be over 31%. Exactly how many union workers do you honestly think makes enough money so that the rate on their taxable income is 31%?

Based on 2010 federal tax tables, a married couple would have to have had taxable income (this is after all the deductions were taken) of something over $200,000 before they would be paying a tax rate that high. Even a single person would have to have taxable income of over $170,000. Now can you honestly tell me that the AVERAGE (because that is what it would have to be to achieve the figures quoted in what you posted) taxable income of all the union dues-paying Americans was over $170,00 - $200,000 per year? I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!




Avatar

OCU


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH!!!
By: ribit
in FFFT
Thu, 07 Jul 11 9:09 AM
Msg. 30488 of 65535

Ending Tax Break for Union Dues Could Save $25 Billion
12:27 PM, JUL 6, 2011 • BY KATE HAVARD

The weekly standard

While President Obama and other Democrats frequently talk about the need for "shared sacrifice" and a "balanced" approach to deficit reduction, their proposal to raise taxes $418 billion is a grab bag of liberal favorites: ending tax breaks for oil companies and corporate jet companies, as well as reducing deductions for couples earning more than $250,000 per year.

While ending the corporate jet tax break will save only $3 billion over the next 10 years, ending a tax break for one big Democratic constituency--unions--could save a lot more money over that same time.

A conservative estimate for union dues paid each year is $8 billion, according to the National Right to Work’s Stan Greer. If over ten years $80 billion in union dues were taxed, the federal government could generate roughly $25 billion in tax revenue.

If the president wants a truly balanced approach to ending tax breaks, why isn't he asking his union friends -- which spent over $400 million on his presidential race and Democratic campaigns in 2008 -- to pay their fair share?

Kate Havard, a student at St. John's College, is an intern at THE WEEKLY STANDARD.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next