« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Airspace Over Flooded Nebraska Nuclear Power Plant Still Closed 

By: Tour in RANT II | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 22 Jun 11 5:34 AM | 31 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II
Msg. 18541 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 18533 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Something must have gone wrong with the experiment, micro. Ohm's law is pretty straightforward. The wattage is printed right on the box. It takes less wattage for these bulbs to pump out as many lumens as a higher-watt incandescent.

By the way, the Feds never told you you can't use a doggone regular light bulb when you want to. You should feel free to use up your stock before moving to the new ones. I think this is part of the problem: People with a high distrust of the government (not that there's anything wrong with that) automatically think something fraudulent must be getting foisted on them. It's just a damn bulb that uses less juice.


- - - - -
View Replies (3) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Airspace Over Flooded Nebraska Nuclear Power Plant Still Closed
By: micro
in RANT II
Wed, 22 Jun 11 4:31 AM
Msg. 18533 of 20747

Hi Tour!

Time for me to weigh in on the "great light bulb" topic.
Those new marvelous spiral shaped bulbs with the mercury inside versus the good old incandescent with tungsten filament light bulb.

The hype on the new bulb was it was going to save us energy because it uses less wattage to illuminate so many lumens.

Wekk, as an experiment well over a year ago, my wife and I purchased over a dozen of these and installed them in our chandeliers and ceiling fan light kits.

We put them in some lamps as well.

Now we had a house full of these things.

My home is totally electric. No gas.

The electric bill the next two months was no different than the previous one when we had incandescent bulbs in those sockets.

Since it is only the two of us who live here, nothing changed.

We should have seen a decrease in electric consumption. We did not.

I realize this was a rather unscientific method of trying this out, but the claim from the lobby pushing these is that they will save us money versus the old reliable bulbs.

That is utter B.S., kinda like a certain software company we know.
It saved us nothing while costing us a whole lot more to purchase a bulb. Substantially more per bulb.

Also, if one reads the packaging the new bulbs come in, they have extensive directions written on them on how to clean up after them in the event one should break in your house.

Now, here is the kicker for you.
I have an entire closet lined with shelves and on all those shelves are boxes of new incandescent light bulbs, mostly 60 watters and a bunch of three ways as well.
I will be doggoned if the fed is going to tell me I can no longer use a regular lightbulb when I want to.

This amounts to nothing more than over reach by an administration pushing an agenda.

Anyway, just thought I would share my personal experience with the light bulb thingy.

Too each their own. Not up to me to tell anyone else what they should use or WHY either.
The best,

micro...


« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next