« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: I appears that Woodall might have some competition for 'hypocrite of the year'...

By: clo in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 26 May 11 2:28 AM | 39 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 29471 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 29470 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Add Mitt Romney to the list of hypocrites...clo

Posted at 02:16 PM ET, 05/25/2011
Romney camp explains claim that he deserves credit for auto industry rebound
By Greg Sargent

Dems and liberal bloggers are having a grand old time mocking Mitt Romney in the wake of his spokesman’s claim today that Romney deserves credit for the rebound of the auto industry — even though he opposed Obama’s auto bailout.

The fun started when a Romney spokesman told the New York Times that “Romney had the idea first,” claiming he advocated for “a course of action that eventually the Obama administration adopted.”Dems immediately countered by pointing out that in 2008, Romney penned an Op ed pillorying the auto bailout with the title: “Let Detroit go bankrupt.”


I asked Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul for clarification of the Romney camp’s claim that he deserves credit for the auto industry’s rebound. She emailed:

“President Obama spent billions of dollars in taxpayer funds to bailout the auto industry. Mitt Romney argued that instead of a bailout, we should let the car companies go through a restructuring under the protection of the bankruptcy laws. This is the course the Obama administration eventually followed. If they had done it sooner, as Mitt Romney suggested, the taxpayers would have saved a lot of money.”

In other words, the Romney camp’s position is that is that Romney pushed for a restructing but without any taxpayer bailout of the industry, and that if Obama had undertaken the restructuring Romney suggested sooner, the bailout would not have been necessary. 

The Dem pushback to this, of course, is obvious. Romney’s suggested course of action, rather than a taxpayer funded bailout, was for a “managed bankruptcy” and a federal role that consisted of “guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing.” Obama, by contrast, argued that a federally-financed bailout would be essential to the auto industry’s comback. “Executing this plan will require a substantial amount of money that only a government can provide,” Obama said at the time.

Even some initial critics of the bailout eventually conceded that Obama had gotten it right. The Economist — hardly a bastion of Big Government liberalism — apologized to Obama for opposing the bailout, noting that it was “unlikely” that the restructuring would have worked “had the government not stepped in.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/romney-camp-explains-claim-that-he-deserves-credit-for-auto-industry-rebound/2011/03/03/AG7VBNBH_blog.html




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
I appears that Woodall might have some competition for 'hypocrite of the year'...
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT
Thu, 26 May 11 2:16 AM
Msg. 29470 of 65535

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/24/paul-gosar-millionaire/


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next