Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

tc, I hear yah. I can hardly wait for the IDCC decision to

By: my3sons87 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 26 May 11 1:47 AM | 57 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications 		Msg. 41127 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 41126 by teecee)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

be released.

The CAFC can rewrite the case law governing claims construction and its application to findings of infringement. No tea leaf reading, or interposing ones opinion, rather the words of the patent and claims and no substituting ones opinion as to the "INTENT" of a claim or patent.

In other words the CAFC has a chance to clarify that the BS will not be tolerated.

Here is hoping we win. And I will see you next week.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
leon
By: teecee in IDCC
Thu, 26 May 11 12:36 AM 		Msg. 41126 of 48237

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63568384 the mindset and intent of the inventor is a very hot topic at the CAFC....i think we saw a ruling the other week from the cafc where this was actually mentioned....they said something like...it was their job to figure out what the inventor was really trying to accomplish....and not thier job to scrutinize every single word used to describe the invention.......if that is truly their current mindset....then i like our chances....idc wasnt trying to trick nokia into paying royalties....their technology was the best solution to a technical hurdle at the time..and was adopted by the standards bodies Naughty Naughty Naughty Naughty Naughty


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next