« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Illinois plan to cut mortgage debt is making waves

By: Decomposed in ROUND | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 23 May 11 5:53 PM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board
Msg. 33039 of 45651
(This msg. is a reply to 33038 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo,

re: "They took a chance & it/I paid off.

I'm glad it worked out. I'm glad your bank was smart enough to realize that you were a good risk. And, rest assured, you were not a charity case. I don't think anyone ordered the bank to take a chance on you.

Taking chances is something businesses, especially banks, SHOULD do. But their motivation is the desire to make money, not altrusim. You say the chance they took "paid" off? Well put! I'm not surprised. I'm sure they did their homework before helping you out.

Unlike business, socialism is ALWAYS a shell game. While its advocates tend to say that economies of scale make social programs work, history and the facts don't support that conclusion. The simple truth is that nearly everything government does, and especially the execution of social programs, it does POORLY - meaning, INEFFICIENTLY. That is because government can't go bankrupt. It isn't held accountable for the money it spends, and it doesn't worry as to whether it can get more. Its programs generally tap an almost bottomless well of "resources" (aka, taxpayers), and success is measured chiefly by a program's POPULARITY... not its achievement. Social programs certainly don't gauge success by the most objective, most telling measure of any program's success: The bottom line. And the thought of profit is practically anathema to supporters of socialism.

Socialism robs unpopular groups and gives the stolen money to popular groups. "Unpopular" in today's culture usually translates to "wealthy," but it also sometimes means "whites," "men," "smokers," "business owners," "shareholders" and "future generations."

Socialism is a philosophy rooted in greed, initiated by THEFT, and accomplished via force, sleight of hand, rhetoric and the all-important ignorance/naiveté of a willing public.

As a person who has a conscience - and who understands - I find socialism repugnant.

In Illinois, the "popular" people are apparently the 3,000 families who will wind up getting bailed out by a financially and morally bankrupt state. What a deal! Of course, 3,000 isn't really very many, but the lucky winners of this lottery will undoubtedly be held aloft by Socialist politicians and their associated leaches for the world to behold . . . as examples of Socialism's success. The press will buy in and the Marching Morons will play their role by voting for still more appropriation and spending of money they themselves did not earn.

This has all been done before: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Tse-tung... all had their poster children... all had their success stories. I sincerely hope the people of Illinois enjoy the parade of salvaged victims they'll soon be seeing - as their politicians merrily lead the entire state (and perhaps the country) down the road to a 3rd world lifestyle.




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Illinois plan to cut mortgage debt is making waves
By: clo
in ROUND
Mon, 23 May 11 4:57 PM
Msg. 33038 of 45651

Decomp,

George Ostendorf, president of American Mortgage Capital Group, said the purchases of non-performing mortgages would be combined with counseling services to help borrowers budget for both their mortgage and non-mortgage debt.

Counselors would, among other things, offer help for spreading out charges in a way that they can be covered. The goal, Ostendorf said, is to help borrowers who have become over-leveraged because of a loss of income, credit-card debt or due to some unexpected costs.

IMO, this is another shell game!

If a "homeowner" is unable to make mortgage payments because of loss of job(s) reducing the amount owed won't change the fact they can't afford it.

If the homeowner is currently working & can payback deliquent payments over a longer period of time, then that's another story.

In 1980 when I was going through a divorce, my ex wasn't paying what the court ordered. I wasn't working yet, and owed 6 months before landing a good job. I spoke with the bank & paid 1 1/2 payments a month until I cleared up the deliquent payments. The bank was more than willing to work with me at the time. I had NO other debt, no cc debt, but I was a woman, mother of three. They took a chance & it/I paid off. ;)) clo


« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next