« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Gingrich to make 2012 run official 

By: clo in ROUND | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 09 May 11 8:47 PM | 62 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board
Msg. 32872 of 45510
(This msg. is a reply to 32871 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Even though I was not enthusastic about Obama, the primaries were amazing & the ENTIRE Democrat Party were extremely enthusastic! Record breaking ;))

That's the difference, we were excited to vote for either Hillary, Obama or Edwards.

As for Republican primaries, if Huckabee throws his hat in then we'll see the religious right get enthusastic.

After the raid, Obama can't be labeled the "dithering president", he's proven cold water runs through his veins, when needed.

This morning I heard the administration is going to beef up the trains in the northeast, this will create jobs & help the economy.

I agree, this election is Obama's to lose. clo




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Gingrich to make 2012 run official
By: Decomposed
in ROUND
Mon, 09 May 11 8:12 PM
Msg. 32871 of 45510

re: "To date even Republicans aren't excited about ANY candidates."

That's understandable. Of course, I could counter your statement by noting that even the day Obummer won the Democratic nomination, vast numbers of Democrats were unenthused about him. You were one of them, weren't you?

Ditto for Americans in general on election day, 2008. They still voted for the man.

In the two elections before that, no one was enthusiastic about GWB. But they still managed to prefer him over either Gore or Kerry, didn't they? I think that's pretty good evidence that your point isn't relevant, clo. Or, at least, the point I'm understanding (which may not be the point you're trying to make, so please clarify it if I'm misunderstanding you) isn't relevant.

It is usually the case with an incumbent that the election result is in his hands. Not the challenger. It's always the incumbent's election to lose . . . and I think that's just what the current President is going to do.

It's the economy. The economy. The economy. And the economy is a lot like the TITANIC. It's huge. It doesn't turn around on a dime. And when it's got a serious breach, the outcome is predictable and inevitable. Obummer might bring out the band and get a whole lot of doomed people to singing along, but the operative word here is "doomed." Singing and hoping and even PRAYING, for those of you with a religious bent, won't change the result.

I don't think that this economy will remain afloat for another 18 months. It doesn't have the legs for it.

People will ultimately vote their wallets. That's only what I think, of course, and like everyone else, I'm often wrong. Obama could still win. Today's Americans are, as I just finished posting, basically unthinking, indecent people. Obama has a lot in common with them. That COULD be enough to swing the election.

But I doubt it. History is on my side, and when it comes to voting, hunger usually trumps logic... sentiment... and 'most everything else. The number of people who really hurting has increased dramatically. For Obama to have a prayer against any Republican, things will have to turn around in a big way pretty darned soon.

Unfortunately, the turnaround I'm seeing is for the worse. Read today's stories, posted here, about the housing sector. And you'll notice that the prices of gold, silver, oil, and other commodities are, once again, soaring.


« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next