Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Wingers Versus Regular People 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Mon, 02 May 11 8:52 PM | 47 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report 		Msg. 36090 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 36062 by killthecat)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

KTC> among scientists on many details about the pace and effects of climate change,


KillTheCat,
It has already been established that the folks
making claims like the one you parroted above
are liars of the first degree.

The 'elite' of the 'global warming alarmists' are
thieves and hypocrites. (Hello - al gore and his
energy hog of a palace? . . . . Temperature
adjustments and deletion of temperature measuring
stations that do not agree with the party line?)

And then the 'elites' are actively conspiring to keep
U.S. from doing the things we could be doing to try
to solve the problem. (No windmills in Nantucket
Bay . . . no nuclear waste dump under Yucca Mountain.)

So, I see no point in my voluntarily lowering MY
standard of living whilst the thieves and con artist
ride around in air conditioned splendor (at my expense,
Of course) . . . .

So, lets crispy critter the planet.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Wingers Versus Regular People
By: killthecat in POPE
Mon, 02 May 11 4:53 PM 		Msg. 36062 of 65535

Although there remains active discussion among scientists on many details about the pace and effects of climate change, no leading science organization disagrees that human activities are now changing the Earth's climate. The strong scientific agreement on this point contrasts with the partisan disagreement seen on all of our surveys,

Most people gather information about climate change not directly from scientists but indirectly, for example through news media, political activists, acquaintances, and other nonscience sources. Their understanding reflects not scientific knowledge, but rather the adoption of views promoted by political or opinion leaders they follow. People increasingly choose news sources that match their own views. Moreover, they tend to selectively absorb information even from this biased flow, fitting it into their pre-existing beliefs.

For example, Annie Coulter is the #1 climatologist for wingers, closely followed by Rush, Sean and AmericanThunker.

« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next