« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Congressional Pensions. 

By: ribit in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 23 Apr 11 4:59 AM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 28501 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 28489 by oldCADuser)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ocu
...there is some reason he picked that date, and I bet it's got something to do with money or benefits or sumpin.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Congressional Pensions.
By: oldCADuser
in FFFT
Fri, 22 Apr 11 10:06 PM
Msg. 28489 of 65535

And as it states, this is really no different than any other federal employee, therefore there is nothing 'special' about it. The only issue that John Ensign might have had is the 5-year vesting provision except that he took office in 2001 so he's already met that criteria.


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next