« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: VIDEO: Paul Ryan Booed At Town Hall For Defending Tax Breaks For The Wealthy 

By: DGpeddler in RANT II | Recommend this post (4)
Fri, 22 Apr 11 4:56 AM | 71 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II
Msg. 17086 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 17055 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Quiz

1. Do you work and earn money? Yes or no?
2. Do you support yourself and your family? Yes or no?
3. Are you paid more if you work more hours? Yes or no?
4. Would you be happy to do the same job for less money? Yes or no.
5. Are you entitled to be paid by your boss for all the time you are on the job? Yes or no?
6. Should your boss be able to withhold part of your paycheck and give that money to one of your co-workers who works fewer hours? Yes or no.

If you answered yes to questions 1, 2, 3, and 5 and no to questions 4 and 6, why do you think the government should have the right to take part of the money you earn and give it to someone who has done nothing to earn it?




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
VIDEO: Paul Ryan Booed At Town Hall For Defending Tax Breaks For The Wealthy
By: clo
in RANT II
Thu, 21 Apr 11 4:26 AM
Msg. 17055 of 20747

Boy Wonder gets a taste of reality!
Oh, I learned in the Nov 2010 election the Republicans got 59% of the "senior votes", they can kiss them goodbye.. clo

VIDEO: Paul Ryan Booed At Town Hall For Defending Tax Breaks For The Wealthy
ThinkProgress filed this report from a town hall meeting in Milton, WI.

Earlier this week, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) embarked on a series of town halls across his southern Wisconsin congressional district. Ryan has gained notoriety in recent weeks as the architect of the Republican budget which extends tax breaks for the wealthy and phases out Medicare. House Republicans voted 235-4 in favor of the plan.

During a town hall meeting in Milton, a constituent who described himself as a “lifelong conservative” asked Ryan about the effects of growing income inequality in our nation. The constituent noted that huge income disparities contributed to the Great Depression and the Great Recession, and thus wanted to know why the congressman was “fighting to not let the tax breaks for the wealthy expire.”

Ryan argued against “redistribut[ing]” in this manner. After the constituent noted that “there’s nothing wrong with taxing the top because it does not trickle down,” Ryan argued that “we do tax the top.” This response earned a chorus of boos from constituents:

CONSTITUENT: The middle class is disappearing right now. During this time of prosperity, the top 1 percent was taking about 10 percent of the total annual income, but yet today we are fighting to not let the tax breaks for the wealthy expire? And we’re fighting to not raise the Social Security cap from $87,000? I think we’re wrong. 

RYAN: A couple things. I don’t disagree with the premise of what you’re saying. The question is what’s the best way to do this. Is it to redistribute… (Crosstalk)

CONSTITUENT: You have to lower spending. But it’s a matter of there’s nothing wrong with taxing the top because it does not trickle down. 

RYAN: We do tax the top. (Audience boos). Let’s remember, most of our jobs come from successful small businesses. Two-thirds of our jobs do. You got to remember, businesses pay taxes individually. So when you raise their tax rates to 44.8 percent, which is what the president is proposing, I would just fundamentally disagree. That is going to hurt job creation.

Watch it:

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/566333/video%3A_paul_ryan_booed_at_town_hall_for_defending_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/


« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next