Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: "I rarely heard a speech by a president so shallow, so hyper-partisan and so intellectually dishonest

By: ribit in RANT II | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 15 Apr 11 5:37 PM | 40 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II 		Msg. 16875 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 16868 by DAC)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

dac
...trump is there to split the conservative vote so Obama can waltz in with a 42 percent "mandate" like bill clinton did.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: "I rarely heard a speech by a president so shallow, so hyper-partisan and so intellectually dishonest
By: DAC in RANT II
Fri, 15 Apr 11 7:26 AM 		Msg. 16868 of 20747

snapits:

We need to be very, very cautious when it comes to Trump. Usually when something sounds too good to be true, it is.

Tonight Hannity had a long interview with Trump and if you set aside everything you know about him you would say, wow, that is a conservative patriotic American. He hit every cord just about right.

But he continues to say if he does not win the GOP nomination he might run as an independent but only if he truly believes he can win a three-man race (ala Jesse Ventura).

There is a little voice in my head that won't quit saying, "watch out, this might be the most elaborate political scam ever invented by the Democrats."

Is it possible Obama's people have made a deal with Trump ... he goes out there and just starts nuking Obama ... just trashes him on the birth certificate, college records, his job performance, everything.

The objective is to get the hardest core conservative block of 20% or so of the normal GOP vote to buy in so completely that they will happily follow Trump off to third-partyland after he loses the nomination.

Voila, like magic, Obama only needs 41% of the total vote to win just like Clinton in 1992 when Perot drained 19% of the vote.

The difference might be that Perot was on his own. I'm not sure about Trump.

« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next