« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Virginia Supreme Court rules against the Democrats Redistricting  

By: CTJ in GRITZ | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 09 May 26 12:29 AM | 23 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 17465 of 17526
(This msg. is a reply to 17462 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

2020, VA voters approved a constitutional amendment creating a bipartisan redistricting commission to handle redistricting.

2026, democrats ignored the constitution, ignored the Will of the People and created their own partisan maps.


Democrat Party. The party of Misery, Violence and Hate.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Virginia Supreme Court rules against the Democrats Redistricting
By: CTJ
in GRITZ
Fri, 08 May 26 4:23 PM
Msg. 17462 of 17526

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled against Democrats’ redistricting effort and it appears Democrats 10-1 gerrymandered map is dead.

“According to the majority, the General Assembly violated the intervening-election requirement in Article XII, Section 1 of the Virginia Constitution by passing a proposed constitutional amendment for the first time after early voters had begun casting their ballots during the 2025 general election. Although Article IV, Section 3 mandates that delegates shall be elected on the Tuesday succeeding the first Monday in November, the majority takes the position that there is a material variation between "shall be elected" and the "general election" described in Article XII Section 1. It reasons that, unlike the single day on which a delegate is elected, a general election is not a fixed day. Instead, they conclude that an election is a cumulative process, encompassing the combined actions of voters casting ballots and officers
receiving those votes, that begins on the first day of early voting and ends on Election Day. By focusing on the legislative history, dictionary definitions, and how legal scholars might interpret the term "election," the majority fails to apply the most basic tenet of interpretation of constitutional provisions: looking to the language of the constitution itself.”

http://x.com/nickminock/status/2052754616232587333?s=61


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next