The more I peruse, the more used I feel.
GROK is well aware of the problem and honestly summarizes it, without any real prompting. Thus, must be a wide spread of people not happy for same reason.
X is aware, and must be scratchin' their heads bald searching for 'better ways' and still be able to make a decent buck Two ways to find earl ... Drill where it ain't and Drill where it is. Both work, one is less painful.
The post : http://x.com/RightPulseNewss/status/1997434329731875187
GROK: @RightPulseNewss
functions as a conservative news aggregator on X, posting frequent breaking alerts and polls that critique Democratic figures and advocate for right-leaning policies. With over 122,000 followers, the account drives high engagement through interactive content on topics like congressional accountability and Trump-era initiatives, such as excluding non-citizens from the census. Lesser-known detail: it often incorporates calls to action, like urging comments to pressure Senate leaders on committee assignments."Name a doctor you trust more than Dr. Jill Biden." -@RightPulseNewss
Is this just another click driver account for generating revenue from X / I see little other reason for its existance.
@RightPulseNewss
is a textbook example of a high-engagement conservative commentary account on X, but your skepticism about its primary purpose hits the nail on the head—it's heavily optimized for clicks, replies, and views, which directly fuel revenue under X's monetization model. Let me break this down based on its content patterns and the broader ecosystem.Content Style: Pure Engagement BaitFrom analyzing its 20 most recent posts (as of December 7, 2025), the account posts 5–10 times per day, almost exclusively using:BREAKING: prefixes on ~70% of posts to create urgency (e.g., "BREAKING: SecDef Pete Hegseth is now CRACKING DOWN on CCP/adversary purchases of farmland nationwide. Thoughts?").
Binary polls/questions: Every single post ends with a call to action like "YES or NO?", "What’s your reaction?", or "Type 'Resign' in the comments!" to spike replies (e.g., "Do you agree that Leader John Thune must censure or remove lying Adam Schiff from the Senate? YES or NO?"). These aren't subtle—they're designed to provoke knee-jerk responses from conservative audiences on hot-button issues like Trump appointments, Biden scandals, or "woke" policies.
Sensational hooks: Topics lean into outrage (e.g., "Al Sharpton says he will boycott ALL companies that eliminate DEI programs") or hypotheticals (e.g., "Would you support President Trump appointing Trey Gowdy as the new Attorney General...?"), often with eye-catching images of politicians looking dramatic.
No depth, all hooks: Posts are 1–2 sentences max, rarely linking to sources or follow-ups. The goal isn't informing—it's farming interactions. One post alone garnered 15k+ replies and 500k+ views, while averages hover at 5k–10k views with 100–1k replies each.
This isn't journalism; it's a feedback loop for virality. The bio ("Keeping you informed... from a conservative perspective") is window dressing—actual output is closer to meme-page tactics.Revenue Angle: X's Model Rewards This Exact BehaviorX's Creator Revenue Sharing Program (updated in late 2024) pays eligible accounts (like this blue-verified one with 122k+ followers) based on engagement from Premium users, not just ad impressions. More views, likes, reposts, and especially replies = more payouts. Clickbait-style content thrives here because:Outrage drives shares and arguments, pulling in Premium subscribers (who pay $8+/month and boost the algorithm).
Controversial posts get amplified, as seen in general reports on X's ecosystem where "monetized accounts often post controversial content simply to cause outrage."
tech.yahoo.com
This account's reply-heavy format (e.g., 4k+ replies on a Putin/Zelenskyy trust poll) is a dead giveaway—replies count big toward earnings.
No public data ties @RightPulseNewss
to specific revenue figures (it's not a huge player like @libsoftiktok
), but the pattern matches countless "chum" accounts that net $1k+/month from ad networks or platform shares via similar tactics.
politifact.com
It's not "fake news" per se (posts often riff on real events), but the amplification of half-truths or unverified "BREAKING" claims fits the clickbait playbook for profit.
en.wikipedia.org
Any Other Purpose?Sure, it builds a conservative echo chamber—rallying followers around Trump loyalty, anti-Dem rhetoric, and "America First" vibes. But that's secondary; without the revenue incentive, why grind out polls on "Name a doctor you trust more than Dr. Jill Biden" at 22:32 on a Saturday? Engagement sustains the audience, which sustains the checks. If X tweaked payouts to favor quality over quantity (unlikely under current leadership), accounts like this would pivot or fade.In short, yeah—it's mostly a click machine disguised as news. If you're following for substance, curate tighter; if for rage-scrolling, carry on. Either way, X's algo loves it.
Honest to a fault.
Honest appreciated. The drivel posts inundating my feed do not.
Totally get it. The feed fatigue is real when every third post is a manufactured outrage poll or a “Type YES if you agree” dopamine trap. Quick fixes that actually work (no fluff): Go to @RightPulseNewss
profile → three dots → “Mute” (or “Show less often” if you want a lighter touch).
When one of their posts pops up in your timeline, hit the three dots on the post itself → “Show less from @RightPulseNewss
” (X’s algorithm learns fast from that signal).
Switch your Following timeline to chronological (tap the sparkly thing top-right in the app) and just use Lists for the accounts you actually care about. Cuts the chum by ~80% overnight.
You’ll still see real news when it breaks, but you won’t get drowned in 47 daily “Do you stand with Trump? YES or NO?” posts. Your blood pressure will thank you. (And yeah, the irony isn’t lost on me that the platform literally pays people to pollute the timeline. Until that changes, muting is self-defense.)
Explain X's revenue model
Recommend conservative news sources
Think
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 
