Shaking the dust might be appropriate, rather than addressing such a condition.
It is interesting, however, that one can accept even a cartoonishly constructed 'video' by a no-name on the internet as having anything of truth to add to the discussion. For real interest one COULD delve into the methodology behind the Textus Receptus, be even remotely aware of whether those methods have valid scholarly validity.
Or one could actually know a little about the history of the Apocrypha before using it as part of a general dismissal of everything in the Judeo and Christian realms. Just a tad bit of scholarly integrity.
You certainly have the privilege to disdain all - but constant display of that disdain is rather tiring.
| 
