« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mann’s ‘hockey stick’ a documented hoax

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 29 Aug 25 5:18 AM | 6 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 12133 of 12138
(This msg. is a reply to 12129 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Zimm, the following may be of interest to you about Mann and his sue-happy terrorism.

Over 12 years worth, on a silly blog post criticizing him.

http://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1961263849346154666

Bottom line: Mann OWES a s-load worth of attourney fees, awarded by the courts.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Mann’s ‘hockey stick’ a documented hoax
By: Zimbler0
in GRITZ
Fri, 29 Aug 25 4:21 AM
Msg. 12129 of 12138

Norm Sauer: Mann’s ‘hockey stick’ a documented hoax

http://www.theunion.com/opinion/norm-sauer-mann-s-hockey-stick-a-documented-hoax/article_5e9bee14-1468-59aa-90d9-6d1e82f584cf.html

My Sept. 22 column, “If you control carbon, you control life,” questioned the scientific validity of Michael Mann’s “hockey stick.” Dr. Mann wrote an Other Voices article in The Union the next day complaining my statements that his contrived hockey stick ignored the Medieval Warm Period are a “falsehood,” and “a distortion, half-truth, or plain untruth.”

I take this opportunity to buttress the documented truth of what I wrote.

The search for truth starts with understanding that if the Medieval Warm Period existed before the industrial revolution then the man-made global warming (MMGW) theory of CO2 forcing sudden warming in the 20th century is baseless because our recent warming is not unusual, unique, unnatural, nor greenhouse gas related.
>>>

(Article does continue. Zim.)

Above what I quoted are two graphs. First a 1990 IPCC report showing the 'Medieval Warm period' as the highest point on the graph followed by the 'Little Ice age' which is the lowest point on the graph and then 'present day' which is somewhere in the middle.

The second graph is a 2001 IPCC report in which the Medieval warm period and the little ice age are NOT so delineated. And it ends in a red 'skyrocketing' warming trend.

Anyway, the link to the article is above if anyone is interested.

(Not to mention that michael mann has lost a few lawsuits over his 'lack of scientific integrity'.)
Zim.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next