« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mars Ice Cap: Climate and Habitability Insights ... + Greenhouse effect digression  

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 19 Aug 25 4:33 AM | 19 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 11794 of 12504
(This msg. is a reply to 11775 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

MonkeyTrots > their big 'email' scandal. NASA's destruction of raw satellite data (climate stuff) was worse, criminal.


Ayup.
Meaning any time 'they' claim the climate is doing this or that . . . They be lying. NOBODY on this planet can truthfully say what the climate is doing - the data has been corrupted.

Let me see . . Barak Obozo . . Stole Tens of Billions and pretended to 'loan' it to his friends for pretending to be green energy companies . . . They all went bankrupt so they wouldn't have to pay the money back. Surprise surprise, they was also ALL barak obozo campaign contibutors.

And then biden - A TRILLION (if not more) STOLEN in the name of green energy . . . $2BILLION given to stacey abrams?

Yeah. Hoax.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Mars Ice Cap: Climate and Habitability Insights ... + Greenhouse effect digression
By: monkeytrots
in GRITZ
Mon, 18 Aug 25 9:45 PM
Msg. 11775 of 12504

Zim >>> Do Martian ice caps grow and shrink much in time with the earths ice caps? Or are Martian ice caps growing while the earths are shrinking?

The Martian ice caps grow and shrink on a Mars annual basis (of course) but the long term trend being in sync or out of sync with earth *ie. variations of solar constant* is ... unknown to me.

I highly doubt that any reasonable comparison can yet be made. Not enough 'observation time' of Mars (up close and personal, detailed) has elapsed (imo) for that determination to have been made. I am sure, though, that various people have looked at that issue, and may have taken a stab at it. I would strongly question such a comparison, no matter which way it went.

On 'lost data', Anglia was bad. Remember, Anglia also faked a lot of crap - their big 'email' scandal. NASA's destruction of raw satellite data (climate stuff) was worse, criminal. Happened under Hussein Ø'fuhrer.


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next