Is it just the dog days of summer, or do the denizens of this board have a jaundiced eye to all 'news' releases, especially those that supposedly are undeniable 'bombshells' that have been 'uncovered' about the depths of past corruption ? We've all heard the accusations, for years, and long ago decided about the veracity of most of
the current exposures. And then we have the 'show me the money' - where are all the gravediggers, those being charged, those going to trial ? Nowhere to be found, eh ?
>>> But as we have recently found out from DNI Tulsi Gabbard and the release of the appendix to the John Durham report, ...
Yes, Tulsi found out - but the 'evidence' definitively linking Obama to the full gamut is weak.
We definitely have the ILLEGAL burying of that PDB (daily presidential brief) - was it done by Obama or at the incentive of Comey, Brennan, Clapper ? We have the next day meeting of the conspirators, where Obama told them to do what ... find at least minimal, even non-consequential evidence of Russian nastiness ? No proof that Obama ordered the full blown 'russia, russia, russia' crap from the three mousketeers - although he certainly knew about it, condoned it, encouraged it ... but where is the courtroom quality proof of even that ?
On 'the release of the appendix to the John Durham report' - WE STILL HAVE NOT SEEN IT, just people 'speaking' about it containing damning evidence.
Is this pattern REALLY going to continue, as Bondi with Epstein (I have it in front of me ... NOT), the 'claims' are known, getting airtime, and lotsa talk ... but ....
SHOW US THE DAMN MONEY.
btw: The internet is NOT forever - things 'get lost', 'buried' and 'erased' all the time.
And when the BS is at Everest heights, one bucket becomes like any other bucket, and one's life isn't long enough to shovel it all in search of the nuggets - even with the sometimes helpful aid of AI engines. Even getting decent, well documented results from AI is like having one's eye teeth removed on a daily basis.