http://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2025/07/14/lefty-woman-says-husbands-should-pay-stay-at-home-wives-a-salary-n2415655
We call Leftist women AWFLs around here. That stands for 'affluent white female liberal' but the fact it's pronounced 'awful' is so fitting.
Because they are.
Here's another AWFL -- sans wedding ring, mind you -- ranting about what married couples should and shouldn't be doing:
American AF (@iAnonPatriot) ~ Liberal woman says that stay-at-home moms should be receiving salaries from their husbands. Thoughts??
Video ~ http://twitter.com/i/status/1944494966593765688
Thoughts? Yep. First of all, you are way, WAY behind the times, dearie ... our wives are FAR more than adequately compensated with a well-endowed package of generous benefits - we give 'em the "D." Secondly, you would know this except for the fact that you are definitely NOT marriage material. But fortunately, for butt-ugly harpies such as yourself, there is a fallback position ...
If she's a stay-at-home mom, he's working to pay for the house, the food, the insurance, the cars, their kids' education, vacations, and everything else they need.
What more does this greedy wench want?
Bleu Cheque (@VERBAL_CHANCLA) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} I truly don’t understand the way their minds work.
Their minds are broken.
Blad (@tlindblad) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} No ring ... big opinions. So - an "expert."
Unfiltered Freedom Fighter (@Haflinger236) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} If you're demanding a paycheck for being a wife, you're not a partner — you're an employee. And, if that paycheck includes access to intimacy, let's stop pretending: you're not describing a marriage; you're describing prostitution. Marriage isn't a transaction. It's a covenant. The moment you start charging for your role, you've already broken it.
Susan C (@Susancottman1) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} I was a stay-at-home mom. My salary was the roof over my head, the food in my cupboard, and the money for all my & my kids' needs being paid for by my wonderful husband. A "salary" is for work, not for doing one's duty.
K Flint (@FreedomNthe_USA) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} If being a wife is now a salaried position, I accept your terms, but let’s be clear - employees have contracts.
That means:
* Performance expectations (health, decorum, intimacy, duties)
* KPIs: Household upkeep, mental health of the family unit, social commitments
* Work schedule: No paid emotional leave, no ‘silent quitting’
* Dress code & behavioral standards
* Annual reviews and renewal clauses
* Release clauses, and forfeiture of joint assets upon breach
* Penalties for emotional misconduct or dereliction of duty
If you want pay, then we apply the same standards we apply to any professional relationship.
With annual renewal clause and prenuptial, or retroactive relinquishment of dual assets. (You don't get to double dip).
Or ... you could just choose love, partnership, and mutual respect, where no one’s "owed" a paycheck for commitment.
We doubt the AWFL would like these terms.
Awww, hell nah! She would ...
... scream bloody murder at the thought of having to hold up her end of the bargain.
Ann Darnell (@ADarnnell) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} My husband gave me everything he earned and I used it to manage the home and nurture the family. This woman has no idea what marriage means.
Not a clue.
Immeressen (@Immeressen69) ~ {Replying to @iAnonPatriot} She will some day die with her cats by her side. Certainly not a family.
The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence
| 
