LOL - too funny - no 'quesswork' being put forth - just simple direct questions about your statements. Quite frankly, I didn't care from the git-go what your motive for making those statements was, and still don't. I simply pointed out that the statements were untrue, backed that up with legit source material, and let it rip from there.
That quite risibly upset you, and still does.
If you don't want discussion on theology - don't make or quote theological statements in your posts.
It's as simple as that, DE.
You're the one that made a statement that you were pretty sure 'the church' had pre-affirmed for you, meaning you were presenting said statement as truth that had been 'affirmed' by some unkown church.
affirmation /ăf″ər-mā′shən/
noun
The act of affirming or the state of being affirmed; assertion.
Something declared to be true; a positive statement or judgment.
The assertion that the testimony one gives is true and equivalent to that which would be given while under oath.
I called it perjury - still do.
And i expect civility, DE - which you have not been in the past few responses. My initial response was courteous, but firm in stating my position. You appear to be reacting with anger, unjustified anger which you are now attempting to justify. Quit accusing me of changing the subject, having blinders on, and so forth.
EOD
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 
