« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Bad Sign?

By: micro in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 29 Jun 25 3:06 PM | 8 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 10559 of 10586
(This msg. is a reply to 10537 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

another flaming example of WHY KAGAN was unqualified as Supreme court Judge and old Katanjeroo as well.

Two IDJITS sitting in the midst of people that actually have depth and understanding of LAW .

Political appointments like these two clowns should not be allowed or permitted due to the important nature of the High Court.

Both of those political appointments to increase females on the court are disasters for Americans..


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Bad Sign?
By: Beldin
in GRITZ
Sat, 28 Jun 25 10:13 PM
Msg. 10537 of 10586

"Radical justices"?! BWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! Ah, clo ... you're such a ridiculous buffoon.

Soooooooooooooooo, is Justice Elena Kagan a "radical justice," dearie??? I bet you think not, right? Well, notwithstanding her current dissenting opinion, Justice Kagan, just 2 or 3 years ago, expressed deep concern about lower court judges preventing a POTUS from doing what he was elected to do, which is to direct and control the Executive Branch. Here is a portion of her statements: "It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stuck for the years that it takes to go through a normal process." ~ Justice Elena Kagan

Here, clo ... dare to educate yourself about "radical justices" ... 

Justice Kagan's 2022 Remarks About National Injunctions Comes Back to Haunt Her

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/06/28/justice-kagans-2022-remarks-about-national-injunctions-comes-back-to-haunt-her-n2659603

Video ~ http://twitter.com/i/status/1938783472635539849

DeVory Darkins (@devorydarkins) ~ Supreme Court Justice Kagan questions the use of nationwide injunctions.

"It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stuck for the years that it takes to go through a normal process."

These nationwide injunctions by radical Democrat judges are going too far; even the liberal Justice Kagan agrees.
Video ~ http://x.com/i/status/1904310437606514909

Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) ~ Jan Crawford at CBS points out liberal Justice Kagan dissented in the universal injuctions case even though she's previously "expressed skepticism about nationwide injunctions when President Biden was in the White House" and calls out the dissenting opinion for talking about birthright citizenship when the majority opinion "has nothing to do with" it.
Video ~ http://x.com/i/status/1938617048172580956


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next