Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Try Again - but ask the correct question. 

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 19 Jun 25 11:28 AM | 16 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 09956 of 10011
(This msg. is a reply to 09955 by De_Composed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The topic was never about whether bitcoin would survive.

You started this argument when you challenged my absolutely correct answer to ZIM's what if - by incorrectly reading Zim's post.

I have not been shown to be wrong,at all, in anything that I have stated, DE.

You, however have.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Try Again - but ask the correct question.
By: De_Composed in GRITZ
Thu, 19 Jun 25 11:22 AM 		Msg. 09955 of 10011

Re: “Not blockchain validation, not trustable. Requires 'multi', ie. at least TWO.”Now ask it if Bitcoin would survive if the network was knocked down to just one node. Oh, that's right. I already did.

You're wrong. I know that's a difficult concept, but it's true. What you're doing now is changing the topic from whether bitcoin would survive to whether it would retain its full functionality (its security.). You shouldn't do that. It's a bad look. As I posted several hours ago about the bitcoin network being so reduced, "So, it's not desired, but no one ever said it was." And that is what Grok is saying too.

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next