Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Predatory Sparrow 

By: Fiz in GRITZ | Recommend this post (2)
Thu, 19 Jun 25 6:19 AM | 16 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 09942 of 09959
(This msg. is a reply to 09938 by monkeytrots)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

MT, What part of "He demonstrated very clearly my understanding was wrong." causes great difficulty for you?

You are wrong. In this case, I linked to an article which explained that pretty clearly.

Intelligence would suggest you be graceful about being wrong, from time to time. One thing AI has now established very clearly: ability to string together sentences grammatically does not correlate very well with intellect.

Do you not realize that graciousness is a currency, also?

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Predatory Sparrow
By: monkeytrots in GRITZ
Thu, 19 Jun 25 5:55 AM 		Msg. 09938 of 09959

LOL - kinda figgered.

Nothing 'erroneous' in my statements, Fiz.

There are certain people who have actually established 'new cryptos' and constructed the server farm for mining same that are known to me.


Think what you wish.


BTW: The logic you have just used is "argumentum ad verecundiam"

- it is known as argument to/by authority. Just returned it to ya.

In English, it’s commonly referred to as the "appeal to authority" fallacy. This occurs when someone claims a statement is true solely because an authority figure or expert says so, without providing sufficient evidence, especially if the authority is not relevant to the topic or the claim is outside their expertise.

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next