Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Predatory Sparrow 

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 19 Jun 25 5:59 AM | 16 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 09940 of 09950
(This msg. is a reply to 09937 by De_Composed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Actually DE, I don't need to grok it.

You actually reworded exactly the same answer I gave Zim.

And we are both wrong. THey don't ALL have to go down.

The correct answer is 'all but one' - One is NOT sufficient to provide valid transactions. At least TWO are required for validity.





Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Predatory Sparrow
By: De_Composed in GRITZ
Thu, 19 Jun 25 5:36 AM 		Msg. 09937 of 09950

mt:

Re: “Try agin, sir ... the question WAS, and I quote, "What happens to the 'Bitcoins' if the Server(s) they 'reside on' get completely obliterated?"”Hey, when you're right, you're right. You can copy-and-paste better than me.

Since you ARE better at copying-and-pasting than I am, why don't you take the question you copied over to Grok and ask it. See if it says that my answer, "They'd have to all go down.," is wrong. There's a lot more value in doing than than in quibbling over whether the question was about a "Server" or "Servers."

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next