What is the difference between inertia and momentum?
Inertia is the property of an object to resist changes to its state of motion, determined by its mass. A heavier object has more inertia, meaning it’s harder to start, stop, or change its direction. It’s a qualitative concept, described by Newton’s First Law.
Momentum is a quantitative measure of an object’s motion, defined as the product of its mass and velocity (p = m·v). It’s a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction. Momentum describes how much motion an object has and is central to Newton’s Second and Third Laws.
Key Differences:
Nature: Inertia is a property (resistance to change), momentum is a measurable quantity (mass times velocity).
Units: Inertia has no units (it’s mass-dependent), momentum is measured in kg·m/s.
Vector/Scalar: Inertia is scalar (mass-based), momentum is a vector (includes direction).
Context: Inertia explains why objects maintain their state; momentum quantifies motion and is conserved in collisions.
Example: A heavy truck has high inertia (hard to move or stop) and, when moving fast, high momentum (large mass × velocity). A bicycle has less inertia and, at the same speed, less momentum due to lower mass.
Is the concept of 'infinite inertia' possible ? Would that concept not violate the LAW of conservation of momentum.
The concept of infinite inertia is not physically possible within the framework of classical physics and would indeed conflict with the law of conservation of momentum, as well as other fundamental principles. Let’s break this down:
What is Infinite Inertia?
Inertia is the property of an object to resist changes to its state of motion, determined by its mass. An object with infinite inertia would, in theory, have infinite mass, making it impossible to accelerate, decelerate, or change its direction, regardless of the force applied. Such an object would remain absolutely fixed in its state of motion (or rest) forever.
Why Infinite Inertia is Not Possible
Infinite Mass and Physical Reality:
In classical mechanics, inertia is directly proportional to mass. Infinite inertia implies infinite mass, which is not observed in the universe. Even massive objects like stars or black holes have finite mass.
In relativity, as an object’s speed approaches the speed of light, its relativistic mass increases, but it never becomes infinite because reaching the speed of light would require infinite energy (per Einstein’s theory of special relativity). Thus, infinite inertia is unattainable.
Implications for Forces:
Newton’s Second Law (F = ma) states that acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. For an object with infinite inertia (infinite mass), any finite force would produce zero acceleration (a = F/∞ = 0). This would make the object immovable, which contradicts the behavior of all known physical systems.
Conflict with the Law of Conservation of Momentum
The law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum of a closed system remains constant if no external forces act on it. Momentum is defined as p = m·v (mass times velocity). Let’s examine how infinite inertia (infinite mass) would affect this:
Infinite Momentum:
If an object has infinite mass and any non-zero velocity, its momentum (p = m·v) would be infinite. In a collision or interaction with another object, conserving momentum would be problematic:
If the infinite-mass object is at rest (v = 0), its momentum is zero (p = ∞·0 = 0, though this is mathematically indeterminate).
If it’s moving (v ≠ 0), its momentum is infinite, and any interaction with a finite-mass object would lead to inconsistencies, as the system’s total momentum would either be undefined or infinite.
In either case, the conservation of momentum becomes impossible to apply meaningfully because infinite quantities disrupt the balance of finite momentum transfers in a closed system.
Collision Scenarios:
Suppose a finite-mass object collides with an infinite-mass object. If the infinite-mass object is immovable (due to infinite inertia), it wouldn’t change velocity, implying that the finite-mass object’s momentum must change to conserve total momentum. However, this could lead to unphysical outcomes, like infinite forces or velocities, violating Newton’s laws.
In a closed system, the presence of infinite momentum (or infinite resistance to momentum change) makes it impossible to conserve a finite total momentum, breaking the conservation law.
Mathematical Breakdown:
Conservation of momentum relies on finite, measurable quantities. Infinite mass introduces indeterminate forms (e.g., ∞·0 or ∞ - ∞) in momentum calculations, rendering the law inapplicable or undefined. Physics avoids such singularities by assuming all objects have finite mass.
Additional Considerations
Relativistic Context: In special relativity, objects approaching the speed of light exhibit increasing relativistic mass, but they never achieve infinite mass. The concept of infinite inertia would require infinite energy, which violates the finite energy constraints of the universe.
Cosmological Perspective: Even in cosmology, concepts like singularities (e.g., in black holes) involve extremely high but finite densities and mass. Infinite inertia is a theoretical abstraction, not a physical reality.
Philosophical Angle: An object with infinite inertia would be akin to an “unmovable object” in the classic paradox of the irresistible force. Such a concept is logically inconsistent with a universe governed by finite physical laws.
Conclusion
The concept of infinite inertia is not possible in classical or relativistic physics because it implies infinite mass, which is unphysical and leads to inconsistencies in applying Newton’s laws and conservation principles. Specifically, it would violate the law of conservation of momentum by introducing infinite or indeterminate momentum, making it impossible to balance momentum in a closed system. All known physical objects have finite mass and inertia, ensuring that momentum conservation holds in observable interactions.
Explain relativistic mass
Explore black hole physics
| 
