« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind.

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 09 Jun 25 5:12 AM | 6 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 09420 of 09425
(This msg. is a reply to 09408 by De_Composed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Decomposed > He thinks that when everything is sufficiently spread apart, matter evaporates and the universe's state is identical to its state prior to the Big Bang.


If all the matter 'evaporates' . . .
Then where does the matter which apparently spontaneously comes into existence come from?

How about this. The Universe is infinite. Meaning there will be an infinite number of 'Big Bangs' and 'Big Crunches'. Each of the 'Big Crunches' will collect matter from 'neighboring' Big Bangs till it has enough to 'Big Bang' itself. Which in turn feeds the fodder to fuel the next big crunch(es).

With hundreds of Billions of years between the Bangs.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind.
By: De_Composed
in GRITZ
Mon, 09 Jun 25 2:44 AM
Msg. 09408 of 09425

fizzy:

Re: “Where, exactly, did the "SUPER massive black hole" come from? ”
Forgive me for responding - I know your question was directed to Zimbler - but I'm weak! I think the answer lies in one of the better known but now discounted theories of how the Universe will end called "The Big Crunch." In The Big Crunch scenario, there is enough matter in the universe's "center" for it to pull the universe back together, undoing the Big Bang. Taking the Big Crunch a bit further, as I think Zimbler has, when the matter and energy from the Big Bang has been re-collected, it can then explode again.

This isn't terribly different from Penrose's idea, imo, except that Penrose's theory has no need for everything to be gathered. He thinks that when everything is sufficiently spread apart, matter evaporates and the universe's state is identical to its state prior to the Big Bang.

I have to admit that it's simpler than the Big Crunch, and it is more compatible with newer calculations and observations showing that the universe will never fall back upon itself. Not because of its mass/gravity, anyway.






« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next