Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind. 

By: Zimbler0 in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 09 Jun 25 1:16 AM | 12 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens! 		Msg. 09402 of 09425
(This msg. is a reply to 09399 by monkeytrots)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

MonkeyTrots > even though the research they are publishing clearly shows the CREATION of matter(and various and sundry particles') where no matter existed 'pre big bang'.


Thank you Professor.
It seems one of my 'problems' with the 'Big Bang' theory does have to do with 'matter apparently appearing from nowhere'.

I believe it also to be safe to say that you and I will disagree as to whether or not 'God did It'. (I'm not going to say God did not do it . . but I can't bring myself to blindly believe he did.)

Given my belief that space is infinite . . and time has no beginning or end . . Infinity, if you will, I find myself with only one theory to believe. That a SUPER massive black hole ate one too many galaxies . . and blew up giving we pathetic humans the illusion that a 'Big Bang' created ALL the Universe.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind.
By: monkeytrots in GRITZ
Mon, 09 Jun 25 12:39 AM 		Msg. 09399 of 09425

Webster:
1 a: general agreement : unanimity
the consensus of their opinion, based on reports … from the border
—John Hersey

Absolutely was using the FIRST definition. And still strenuously object to using that as ANY form of 'validation of truth'.

It is nothing better than 'argumentation by authority', in this case 'the authority of the majority'.

It still remains, irrefutably, a basic error in logic.

There is little doubt in my mind that the majority of vocal physicists pushing hypothesis (NOT theories) of the big bang do not believe in Creation - even though the research they are publishing clearly shows the CREATION of matter(and various and sundry particles') where no matter existed 'pre big bang'.

Also of note: NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF OTHER UNIVERSES - but widely 'believed' to be possible.

God CEASED creating on the Seventh Day. There is no evidence of any more 'matter' creating 'big bangs' occurring elsewhere or since. Again, observable science not being in disagreement with the 'simple minded' explanation of Genesis.

« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next