« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind. 

By: monkeytrots in GRITZ | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 09 Jun 25 12:39 AM | 14 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 09399 of 09425
(This msg. is a reply to 09397 by De_Composed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Webster:
1 a: general agreement : unanimity
the consensus of their opinion, based on reports … from the border
—John Hersey

Absolutely was using the FIRST definition. And still strenuously object to using that as ANY form of 'validation of truth'.

It is nothing better than 'argumentation by authority', in this case 'the authority of the majority'.

It still remains, irrefutably, a basic error in logic.

There is little doubt in my mind that the majority of vocal physicists pushing hypothesis (NOT theories) of the big bang do not believe in Creation - even though the research they are publishing clearly shows the CREATION of matter(and various and sundry particles') where no matter existed 'pre big bang'.

Also of note: NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF OTHER UNIVERSES - but widely 'believed' to be possible.

God CEASED creating on the Seventh Day. There is no evidence of any more 'matter' creating 'big bangs' occurring elsewhere or since. Again, observable science not being in disagreement with the 'simple minded' explanation of Genesis.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: What is Twistor Theory? | Roger Penrose AND What came before Big Bang? Why he changed his mind.
By: De_Composed
in GRITZ
Mon, 09 Jun 25 12:32 AM
Msg. 09397 of 09425

Re: “Scientific consensus has ALWAYS been a lazy way of 'argument by authprity'.Fair enough. I'll just point out that "consensus" has more than one definition and yours is #2 in the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Before we went off on the this tangent, I used the word in its primary sense. I now regret not using its synonym, "general agreement," as it would have caused less confusion.





« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next