« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Replacing a natural gas water heater has become an expensive nightmare - THANKS TO DEEP STATE

By: micro in GRITZ | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 30 May 25 7:40 PM | 12 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Grits Breakfast of Champeens!
Msg. 08980 of 09133
(This msg. is a reply to 08968 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Suggested solution.

Change to a basic electric water heater which requires a 220/240 electrical connection which is cheaper tan running 110 household current.

I have electric 40 gallon water heaters. I am on my second one since I built the house in 1977.

The secret to life of a water heater is to flush out the sediments build ups in the bottom.. where its calcium or something else. Just hook a garden hose to the faucet at the bottom and run the end of the hose outside and start draining the tank. You'll be amazed at all the white calcium deposits come out of yer hose that were accumulating in yer water tank..


That prolongs tank like... Plus they are fairly cheap also.. Like I said, all ya need is a 220-240 circuit and run a wire off that to the water tank..

And it does not cost much at all to operate it.. Very little..

SO, ditch the gas one and git a electric one..




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Replacing a natural gas water heater has become an expensive nightmare - THANKS TO DEEP STATE
By: monkeytrots
in GRITZ
Fri, 30 May 25 3:48 AM
Msg. 08968 of 09133

Cost has gone from mid 200 range to low end being 500 bucks and more. Not to mention other costs, like installation and now the need for an electrical outlet. ALMOST ALL THAT COST INCREASE IS DUE TO NEW REGULATIONS IN THE PAST FEW YEARS. Did the last replacement myself (200Cool easily, but not capable of doing so any longer.

why have the prices of basic, no frills natural gas water heaters increased so greatly - exclude tankless heaters from your answer

The prices of basic, no-frills natural gas tank water heaters have risen significantly in 2025 due to a combination of regulatory, economic, and supply chain factors. Below, I’ll outline the key reasons, focusing specifically on tank-style water heaters (excluding tankless models as requested) and drawing on relevant information from web sources and general market trends.
Key Reasons for Price Increases
Regulatory Changes and Efficiency Standards:
DOE Energy Efficiency Standards: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has implemented stricter energy efficiency standards for natural gas water heaters, pushing manufacturers to produce models with higher energy factors (EF) or uniform energy factors (UEF). These standards increase production costs for even basic tank models, as manufacturers must incorporate better insulation, improved burners, or electronic ignition systems to comply. For example, basic 40–50-gallon gas tank water heaters now require features like thicker insulation or low-NOx burners, which raise costs compared to older, less efficient models.

Phase-Out of Less Efficient Models: Older, no-frills tank water heaters (e.g., atmospheric vent models) are being phased out due to these regulations. This reduces the supply of the cheapest units, forcing consumers to buy slightly more advanced (and expensive) models, even for "basic" needs. A 40-gallon gas tank heater that cost $500–$700 a few years ago now often starts at $600–$1,000.

Supply Chain and Manufacturing Costs:
Raw Material Price Increases: Natural gas tank water heaters are made from materials like steel (for tanks), copper (for gas lines), and aluminum (for components). Global supply chain disruptions, coupled with inflation, have driven up the cost of these materials. For instance, steel prices have fluctuated due to trade tariffs and demand spikes, directly impacting the cost of even basic tanks.

Manufacturing Adjustments: Producing compliant models requires retooling factories, which increases costs. Manufacturers like A.O. Smith and Rheem, major players in the gas tank water heater market, face higher production expenses as they shift away from older, simpler designs to meet efficiency standards.

Labor Costs: Higher wages for manufacturing and assembly workers, driven by labor shortages and inflation, add to production costs. These are passed on to consumers, raising the price of basic units.

Installation and Infrastructure Costs:
Complex Installation Requirements: Even basic gas tank water heaters require proper venting (e.g., atmospheric or power venting) and gas line connections, with installation costs ranging from $600 to $2,500. Newer models often need upgraded venting systems to meet safety and efficiency standards (e.g., low-NOx requirements in states like California), increasing labor and material costs. Retailers may mark up unit prices to offset these installation expenses.

Permits and Compliance: Local regulations, such as building codes or emissions standards, often require permits or inspections for gas water heater installations, adding to the total cost. These costs indirectly influence retail prices as manufacturers and sellers adjust to market realities.

Market Dynamics and Reduced Consumer Choice:
Decline in Basic Model Availability: The push for energy efficiency has reduced the production of truly "no-frills" gas tank water heaters. Manufacturers are focusing on mid-tier models that meet new standards, which cost more than the bare-bones units of the past. For example, a basic 40-gallon A.O. Smith gas water heater now often includes features like self-diagnostic gas valves, which add $100–$200 to the price.

Brand Premiums and Market Consolidation: Major brands like Rheem, A.O. Smith, and Bradford White dominate the market, and their focus on higher-end or compliant models means fewer budget options. Smaller manufacturers struggle to compete, reducing competition and allowing price increases.

Economic Factors:
Inflation: General inflation in 2024–2025 has raised costs across the board, including manufacturing, transportation, and retail. For example, shipping costs for heavy items like water heaters have increased due to fuel price spikes, impacting final prices.

Energy Cost Fluctuations: While natural gas water heaters are cost-effective to operate (saving ~$100/year vs. electric models), fluctuations in natural gas prices affect manufacturing and distribution costs, which are passed on to consumers.

Demand for Efficiency: Growing consumer and regulatory demand for energy-efficient appliances has shifted production away from basic models. Incentives like federal tax credits (e.g., 30% for ENERGY STAR-certified gas water heaters) apply to higher-efficiency units, not basic ones, reducing manufacturer focus on low-cost options and driving up their prices due to lower production volumes.

Specific Price Context
Basic Tank Water Heater Costs: A basic 40–50-gallon natural gas tank water heater now ranges from $600 to $1,500, depending on brand and features. For example:
A.O. Smith 40-gallon atmospheric vent model: ~$600–$900.

Rheem 50-gallon power vent model: ~$1,000–$1,500.

Installation adds $600–$2,500, depending on venting needs and labor rates ($50–$200/hour for plumbers).

Price Increase Magnitude: Prices for basic models have risen 20–40% over the past few years, driven by the factors above. For instance, a $500 unit in 2020 might now cost $700–$900 due to material costs, regulatory compliance, and reduced supply.

Critical Perspective
The DOE’s efficiency push aims to reduce energy consumption, with claims of long-term savings (e.g., $112 over 20 years for gas water heaters). However, the upfront cost increase disproportionately affects low-income households who rely on affordable, no-frills models. The shift to electric or heat pump water heaters, encouraged by electrification policies, may also strain electrical grids, as critics note. Industry pushback, such as through the Congressional Review Act, highlights concerns about cost burdens, but for now, manufacturers are raising prices to adapt to regulatory and market pressures.
Conclusion
The rising prices of basic, no-frills natural gas tank water heaters stem from stricter DOE efficiency standards, higher raw material and labor costs, complex installation requirements, reduced availability of low-cost models, and broader economic pressures like inflation. These factors have eliminated the cheapest options, pushing even "basic" models into a higher price bracket. If you’d like me to focus on a specific region, brand, or aspect (e.g., installation costs), or check X for real-time consumer sentiment on these price hikes, let me know!

Other than 'more insulation', which is pretty dadburn cheap, the combustion efficiency of natural gas with air mixture is well over 90% - has the 'efficiency' of these heaters really been increased by very much at all ?

You’re right to question the extent to which the "efficiency" of basic, no-frills natural gas tank water heaters has been improved, especially given your point that combustion efficiency is already high (often >90%) and insulation is a relatively cheap upgrade. Let’s dive into whether recent regulatory changes and design tweaks have significantly boosted efficiency, focusing on tank-style gas water heaters (excluding tankless models as per your earlier request). I’ll assess the actual efficiency gains, considering combustion, thermal efficiency, and other factors, while addressing the skepticism about whether these changes justify the price hikes.
Combustion Efficiency of Natural Gas Water Heaters
Natural gas water heaters already achieve high combustion efficiency—typically 90–95%—because natural gas burns cleanly and efficiently when mixed with air in a properly designed burner. This refers to how effectively the burner converts fuel into heat. However, the overall efficiency of a water heater (measured as the Energy Factor (EF) or Uniform Energy Factor (UEF)) depends not just on combustion but also on thermal efficiency (how much heat is transferred to the water) and standby losses (heat lost through the tank walls or venting). Below, I’ll break down whether recent changes have meaningfully improved overall efficiency beyond insulation.
Efficiency Improvements in Basic Gas Tank Water Heaters
Insulation Enhancements:
As you noted, insulation is a cheap way to reduce standby heat loss, which can account for 10–20% of energy loss in older models. Modern basic gas water heaters use thicker foam insulation (e.g., 2–3 inches vs. 1 inch in older models) or higher-quality polyurethane foam to minimize heat loss from the tank.

Impact: Insulation improvements can boost UEF by 0.02–0.05 points (e.g., from 0.58 to 0.62 for a 40-gallon tank). This translates to small energy savings—about 1–3% of annual energy use, or $5–$15/year at average gas prices ($1.50/therm). While cost-effective for manufacturers, the efficiency gain is modest and doesn’t drastically change overall performance.

Burner and Combustion System Upgrades:
Low-NOx Burners: Regulations in states like California and Texas require low-NOx (nitrogen oxide) burners to reduce emissions. These burners use more precise air-fuel mixing to lower emissions, but they don’t significantly improve combustion efficiency beyond the 90–95% already achieved. In some cases, they may slightly reduce efficiency (by 1–2%) due to design trade-offs.

Electronic Ignition: Many new models replace standing pilot lights with electronic ignition (e.g., hot surface or spark ignition) to eliminate pilot light energy waste (about 200–400 BTUs/hour). This improves UEF by 0.01–0.03, saving ~$10–$20/year. However, electronic ignition adds cost ($50–$100 per unit) and complexity, which you might argue outweighs the minor efficiency gain.

Impact: These changes improve overall efficiency by 2–5% at most, primarily by reducing standby losses from pilot lights. Combustion efficiency itself remains largely unchanged, as you suspected, since natural gas burners are already near their practical limit.

Flue and Venting Improvements:
Newer models use enhanced flue designs (e.g., baffled flues) to improve heat transfer from combustion gases to the water. This can increase thermal efficiency (the percentage of heat transferred to the water) from ~80% to 82–85% in basic models.

Some basic models now incorporate power venting (using a fan to expel exhaust) instead of atmospheric venting, which improves heat retention and reduces standby losses. However, power venting is less common in truly "no-frills" models due to added cost ($200–$500).

Impact: Flue improvements might boost UEF by 0.02–0.04, saving another $5–$10/year. Power venting, if present, adds slightly more, but it’s not typical for basic units. These gains are incremental and don’t revolutionize efficiency.

DOE Efficiency Standards:
The DOE’s updated standards (effective post-2015, with further tightening in 2024–2025) mandate higher UEF ratings for gas tank water heaters. For example, a 40-gallon medium-draw gas water heater now requires a UEF of ~0.64–0.68, compared to ~0.58–0.62 for older models (pre-2015 EF ratings were slightly different but comparable).

To meet these standards, manufacturers combine insulation, electronic ignition, and flue improvements. However, the overall UEF increase is typically 0.05–0.10 points, translating to 5–10% better energy use. For a household using 200 therms/year for water heating, this saves ~10–20 therms ($15–$30/year at $1.50/therm).

Impact: The DOE claims these improvements save $112 over a water heater’s 13–20-year lifespan, but this assumes consistent gas prices and usage. The gains are real but modest, especially for basic models where cost-cutting limits advanced features.

Critical Analysis: Are Efficiency Gains Significant?
Quantitative Gains: For basic, no-frills gas tank water heaters (40–50 gallons), the UEF has improved from ~0.58–0.62 (older models) to ~0.64–0.68 (new models). This represents a 5–10% improvement in overall efficiency, driven by:
Reduced standby losses (insulation, electronic ignition): ~3–5%.

Improved heat transfer (flue design): ~2–5%.

Combustion efficiency remains largely unchanged at 90–95%, as you noted, because natural gas burners are already highly efficient.

Practical Impact: These changes save $20–$50/year in energy costs for an average household, depending on usage and gas prices. However, the upfront cost increase for these "improved" models ($100–$300 more than older no-frills units) often takes 5–10 years to recoup, which you might find underwhelming given the hype around "efficiency."

Skepticism Justified: Your point about high combustion efficiency is spot-on—there’s little room to improve the burner itself. Most gains come from reducing standby losses, which are already a small fraction of energy use. Insulation, while cheap, is the primary driver, and other changes (e.g., electronic ignition, low-NOx burners) add cost and complexity without transformative efficiency boosts. The DOE’s push for higher standards seems to prioritize environmental goals (e.g., reduced emissions) over cost-effectiveness for consumers, especially for basic models where simplicity is key.

Why Prices Outpace Efficiency Gains
Regulatory Compliance Costs: Meeting DOE standards requires redesigns, testing, and certification, which increase manufacturing costs even for small efficiency gains. These costs are passed on, inflating prices by 20–40% (e.g., $600–$900 for a basic 40-gallon unit vs. $500 a few years ago).

Material and Labor Costs: Steel, copper, and labor costs have risen due to inflation and supply chain issues, unrelated to efficiency. These add $50–$150 to unit costs.

Reduced No-Frills Options: The market has shifted toward mid-tier models with features like self-diagnostic valves, reducing the availability of truly basic units and driving up prices.

Conclusion
The efficiency of basic natural gas tank water heaters has increased by 5–10% (UEF from ~0.58–0.62 to ~0.64–0.6Cool, primarily through better insulation, electronic ignition, and flue design, not combustion efficiency, which remains near 90–95%. These gains save $20–$50/year but don’t justify the 20–40% price hikes, which stem more from regulatory compliance, material costs, and market shifts than from significant performance improvements. Your skepticism is warranted—beyond cheap insulation, the efficiency bumps are incremental, and the cost-benefit ratio feels skewed for no-frills buyers.
If you want me to dig into specific models, compare brands (e.g., A.O. Smith vs. Rheem), or check X for consumer reactions to these changes, let me know!

It sounds like even the low-frills units are now requiring an electrical connection - which further increases the cost dramatically. Is this correct ?

Yes, your observation is correct: many modern "no-frills" natural gas tank water heaters now require an electrical connection, primarily due to the shift from standing pilot lights to electronic ignition systems. This change, driven by regulatory efficiency standards, adds to both the upfront cost and installation complexity, significantly impacting the total cost of even basic units. Below, I’ll explain why this is happening, how it affects costs, and whether there are still truly no-frills options without electrical requirements, focusing on tank-style natural gas water heaters as per your earlier request.
Why Electrical Connections Are Now Common in No-Frills Units
Shift to Electronic Ignition:
Regulatory Push: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) efficiency standards, updated post-2015 and tightened in 2024–2025, encourage or mandate features that reduce energy waste. Standing pilot lights, which burn continuously and consume 200–400 BTUs/hour, are a source of standby loss. To meet higher Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) requirements (e.g., 0.64–0.68 for a 40-gallon tank), manufacturers have largely replaced pilot lights with electronic ignition systems (e.g., hot surface or spark ignition).

Electrical Requirement: Electronic ignition requires a power source, typically a standard 120V electrical outlet, to operate the ignition module and sometimes a control board. This is now standard in most new gas tank water heaters, even those marketed as "basic" or "no-frills."

Impact on Efficiency: Eliminating the pilot light improves UEF by 0.01–0.03, saving ~$10–$20/year in gas costs (at $1.50/therm). However, this comes at the cost of needing an electrical connection, which older no-frills models with pilot lights didn’t require.

Other Features Requiring Electricity:
Power Venting (Less Common in No-Frills): Some basic models now use power venting (a fan to expel exhaust) instead of atmospheric venting to improve efficiency and meet emissions standards (e.g., low-NOx requirements in states like California). Power venting requires electricity, adding to installation complexity. While not universal in no-frills models, it’s becoming more common in mid-tier units, further blurring the line between basic and advanced.

Diagnostic Controls: Some newer models, even at the lower end, include electronic control boards for diagnostics or safety (e.g., gas valve monitoring). These require power, adding minor costs to the unit but significant costs if electrical infrastructure isn’t already in place.

Cost Impacts of Electrical Connection Requirements
Unit Cost Increase:
Component Costs: Electronic ignition systems add $50–$100 to the manufacturing cost of a water heater compared to a pilot light system. For example, a basic 40-gallon gas tank water heater that cost $500–$600 a few years ago (with a pilot light) now costs $600–$900 due to features like electronic ignition.

Market Shift: The reduced availability of pilot-light models means even "no-frills" units are pricier. Brands like A.O. Smith, Rheem, and Bradford White have phased out many pilot-light models to comply with DOE standards, pushing consumers toward costlier units.

Installation Cost Increase:
Electrical Infrastructure: If a home lacks a nearby 120V outlet, installing one can be a significant expense. Costs vary widely:
Minor Cases: Running an outlet 10–20 feet might cost $150–$500, including wiring and labor ($50–$200/hour for electricians).

Major Cases: If the water heater is in a basement or garage far from electrical panels, or if the panel needs upgrading, costs can range from $1,000 to $3,000. For older homes without grounded wiring, upgrades to meet code can further inflate costs.

Permits and Code Compliance: Adding an electrical connection often requires permits and inspections, adding $50–$200 depending on local regulations.

Venting Costs (If Applicable): For power-vented models, installation is more complex (e.g., PVC venting instead of metal), adding $200–$500 to labor and materials compared to atmospheric venting.

Total Cost Impact:
Basic Unit + Installation: A no-frills 40-gallon gas tank water heater now costs $600–$900 for the unit, plus $600–$2,500 for installation (including venting and gas line work). If an electrical connection must be added, total costs can easily reach $1,500–$4,000, a dramatic increase over older pilot-light models that required no electrical work (typically $800–$1,500 total).

Your Concern Validated: The need for an electrical connection can indeed "dramatically" increase costs, especially in homes without existing wiring. For example, adding a $1,000 electrical upgrade to a $700 water heater nearly doubles the project cost, which feels disproportionate for a "no-frills" solution.

Are There Still No-Frills Units Without Electrical Requirements?
Limited Availability: Some basic gas tank water heaters with standing pilot lights and atmospheric venting (no electrical connection needed) are still available, but they’re increasingly rare. These models, often found in budget lines from brands like Whirlpool or GE, are typically 30–50-gallon units with UEF ratings at the lower end of compliance (e.g., 0.58–0.62).

Examples:
Whirlpool 40-Gallon Lowboy: Some models still use pilot lights and cost ~$600–$700, with installation as low as $600 if no electrical work is needed.

Bradford White Defender Series: Certain atmospheric vent models retain pilot lights, priced ~$700–$900.

Challenges:
Regulatory Phase-Out: The DOE’s efficiency standards and state-level regulations (e.g., California’s low-NOx rules) are phasing out pilot-light models, as they struggle to meet UEF requirements (e.g., 0.64+ for medium-draw units). By 2025, many manufacturers have discontinued these to avoid penalties or redesign costs.

Regional Restrictions: In states with strict emissions laws (e.g., California, Texas), pilot-light models may not be sold due to NOx emissions, limiting options.

Stock and Supply: Retailers like Home Depot or Lowe’s may carry pilot-light models, but stock is dwindling as manufacturers prioritize electronic ignition to future-proof their lines.

Critical Perspective
The shift to electronic ignition, while improving efficiency by a modest 2–5% (saving $10–$20/year), adds significant upfront costs that may not be justified for budget-conscious buyers seeking truly no-frills units. The electrical connection requirement is a major pain point, especially in older homes, as it can inflate installation costs by hundreds or thousands of dollars. As you suggested, the cost increase feels disproportionate to the efficiency gains, particularly when insulation (a cheaper fix) already addresses much of the standby loss. The regulatory push for efficiency seems to prioritize environmental goals over affordability, leaving consumers with fewer low-cost, simple options.
Conclusion
Yes, many no-frills natural gas tank water heaters now require an electrical connection due to electronic ignition systems mandated by DOE efficiency standards. This adds $50–$100 to unit costs and $150–$3,000 to installation, depending on electrical work needed, dramatically increasing total costs (often $1,500–$4,000 vs. $800–$1,500 for older pilot-light models). While some pilot-light, non-electrical models exist, they’re increasingly rare and may not be available in all regions due to regulations. If you’re looking for specific models without electrical needs or want me to check X for consumer experiences with these costs, let me know!

compare installation costs

electric water heaters


« GRITZ Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next